Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Edita Food

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Edita Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Edita Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Edita Food Industries, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Edita Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Edita Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Edita Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Edita Food

-0.43

Correlation Coefficient

Litigation Capital  Edita Food

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Edita is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Edita Food Industries in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Edita Food Industries and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Edita Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Edita Food Industries has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Edita Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Edita Food

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.13 times more return on investment than Edita Food. However, Litigation Capital Management is 7.91 times less risky than Edita Food. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Edita Food Industries is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,300  in Litigation Capital Management on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  450.00  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 3.98% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	95.45%
Values	Daily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Edita Food Industries

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Edita Food Industries

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Edita Food Industries has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Edita Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Edita Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Edita Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Edita Food will offset losses from the drop in Edita Food's long position.

The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Edita Food Industries pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.