Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Empire Metals

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Empire Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Empire Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Empire Metals Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Empire Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Empire Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Empire Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Empire Metals

-0.57

Correlation Coefficient

Litigation Capital  Empire Metals

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Empire is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Empire Metals Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Empire Metals Limited and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Empire Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Empire Metals Limited has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Empire Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Empire Metals

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital is expected to generate 4.23 times less return on investment than Empire Metals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Litigation Capital Management is 2.44 times less risky than Empire Metals. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Empire Metals Limited is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  183.00  in Empire Metals Limited on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  527.00  from holding Empire Metals Limited or generate 287.98% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Empire Metals Limited

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Empire Metals Limited

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Very Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Empire Metals Limited are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Empire Metals is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Empire Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Empire Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Empire Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Empire Metals will offset losses from the drop in Empire Metals' long position.

The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Empire Metals Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.