Correlation Between Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Zurich Insurance Group and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Zurich Insurance with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital

-0.95

Correlation Coefficient

Zurich Insurance  Litigation Capital

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Zurich and Litigation is -0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Zurich Insurance Group and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Zurich Insurance Group are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Zurich Insurance i.e., Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Zurich Insurance Group is expected to generate 0.34 times more return on investment than Litigation Capital. However, Zurich Insurance Group is 2.96 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  53,880  in Zurich Insurance Group on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8,310  from holding Zurich Insurance Group or generate 15.42% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Zurich Insurance Group  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

Zurich Insurance

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zurich Insurance Group are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Zurich Insurance unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Pair Trading with Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Zurich Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.

The idea behind Zurich Insurance Group and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.