Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Gaztransport

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Gaztransport at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Gaztransport into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Gaztransport et Technigaz, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Gaztransport and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Gaztransport. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Gaztransport.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Gaztransport

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Gaztransport is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Gaztransport et Technigaz in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaztransport et Technigaz and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Gaztransport. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaztransport et Technigaz has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Gaztransport go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Gaztransport

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 1.46 times more return on investment than Gaztransport. However, Litigation Capital is 1.46 times more volatile than Gaztransport et Technigaz. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Gaztransport et Technigaz is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,817  in Litigation Capital Management on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,983  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 43.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Gaztransport et Technigaz

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Gaztransport et Technigaz 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gaztransport et Technigaz are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Gaztransport may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Litigation Capital and Gaztransport Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Gaztransport

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Gaztransport positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Gaztransport can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaztransport will offset losses from the drop in Gaztransport's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Gaztransport et Technigaz pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets