Correlation Between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Legg Mason with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Legg and Goldman is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Global and Legg Mason is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Legg Mason Global are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Global has no effect on the direction of Legg Mason i.e., Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Legg Mason Global is expected to generate 0.48 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Legg Mason Global is 2.1 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Global is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  958.00  in Legg Mason Global on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (41.00) from holding Legg Mason Global or give up 4.28% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Legg Mason Global  vs.  Goldman Sachs Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Legg Mason Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Legg Mason Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Legg Mason is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Legg Mason position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios