Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Smallmid and Miller Vertible Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Miller Convertible. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible

0.79

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Miller Convertible

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Miller is 0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Smallmid and Miller Vertible Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Miller Vertible Bond and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Smallmid are associated (or correlated) with Miller Convertible. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Miller Vertible Bond has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Smallmid is expected to under-perform the Miller Convertible. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 3.83 times more volatile than Miller Vertible Bond. It trades about -0.15 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Miller Vertible Bond is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,266  in Miller Vertible Bond on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (30.00) from holding Miller Vertible Bond or give up 2.37% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Smallmid  vs.  Miller Vertible Bond

Goldman Sachs Smallmid

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Smallmid has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Miller Vertible Bond

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Miller Vertible Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Miller Convertible is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Miller Convertible positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Miller Convertible can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Miller Convertible will offset losses from the drop in Miller Convertible's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Smallmid and Miller Vertible Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .