Correlation Between Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goosehead Insurance with a short position of PennantPark Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating.
Diversification Opportunities for Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating
0.66 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Goosehead and PennantPark is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Floating Rate and Goosehead Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goosehead Insurance are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of Goosehead Insurance i.e., Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Goosehead Insurance is expected to generate 3.54 times more return on investment than PennantPark Floating. However, Goosehead Insurance is 3.54 times more volatile than PennantPark Floating Rate. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Floating Rate is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,932 in Goosehead Insurance on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,722 from holding Goosehead Insurance or generate 17.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Goosehead Insurance vs. PennantPark Floating Rate
Performance |
Timeline |
Goosehead Insurance |
PennantPark Floating Rate |
Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating
The main advantage of trading using opposite Goosehead Insurance and PennantPark Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goosehead Insurance position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Floating will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Floating's long position.Goosehead Insurance vs. Enstar Group Limited | Goosehead Insurance vs. Waterdrop ADR | Goosehead Insurance vs. Axa Equitable Holdings | Goosehead Insurance vs. Hartford Financial Services |
PennantPark Floating vs. Gladstone Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Horizon Technology Finance | PennantPark Floating vs. Stellus Capital Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Prospect Capital |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets |