Correlation Between GM and SICC
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and SICC Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and SICC and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of SICC. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and SICC.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and SICC
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and SICC is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and SICC Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SICC and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with SICC. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SICC has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and SICC go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and SICC
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.43 times more return on investment than SICC. However, GM is 1.43 times more volatile than SICC Co. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SICC Co is currently generating about -0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest 5,475 in General Motors on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (294.00) from holding General Motors or give up 5.37% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 95.65% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. SICC Co
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
SICC |
GM and SICC Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and SICC
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and SICC positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, SICC can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SICC will offset losses from the drop in SICC's long position.The idea behind General Motors and SICC Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.SICC vs. HeBei Jinniu Chemical | SICC vs. Guizhou Chanhen Chemical | SICC vs. Yangmei Chemical Co | SICC vs. Hubei Xingfa Chemicals |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |