Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs International and Calvert Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Calvert Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Calvert is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs International and Calvert Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Emerging Markets and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs International are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs International is expected to under-perform the Calvert Emerging. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 1.15 times more volatile than Calvert Emerging Markets. It trades about -0.47 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.35 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,195  in Calvert Emerging Markets on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (77.00) from holding Calvert Emerging Markets or give up 6.44% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs International  vs.  Calvert Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Calvert Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Calvert Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Calvert Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs International and Calvert Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges