Correlation Between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commonwealth Global with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commonwealth and Goldman is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Intern and Commonwealth Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commonwealth Global Fund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Intern has no effect on the direction of Commonwealth Global i.e., Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commonwealth Global Fund is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Commonwealth Global Fund is 1.06 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs International is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,374  in Goldman Sachs International on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  163.00  from holding Goldman Sachs International or generate 11.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commonwealth Global Fund  vs.  Goldman Sachs International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commonwealth Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Commonwealth Global Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Commonwealth Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs International are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commonwealth Global position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins