Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Natural Alternatives. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

0.85

Correlation Coefficient

FitLife Brands,  Natural Alternatives

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Natural is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives Internati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Natural Alternatives and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Natural Alternatives. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Natural Alternatives has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to under-perform the Natural Alternatives. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, FitLife Brands, Common is 1.17 times less risky than Natural Alternatives. The stock trades about -0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Natural Alternatives International is currently generating about -0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  431.00  in Natural Alternatives International on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (86.00) from holding Natural Alternatives International or give up 19.95% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Natural Alternatives Internati

FitLife Brands, Common

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Natural Alternatives

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Natural Alternatives International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Natural Alternatives positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Natural Alternatives can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Natural Alternatives will offset losses from the drop in Natural Alternatives' long position.

The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Natural Alternatives International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.