Correlation Between Citigroup and 84859DAA5
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and SR 33 01 JUN 51, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and 84859DAA5 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of 84859DAA5. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and 84859DAA5.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and 84859DAA5
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and 84859DAA5 is 0.46. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and SR 33 01 JUN 51 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on 84859DAA5 and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with 84859DAA5. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of 84859DAA5 has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and 84859DAA5 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and 84859DAA5
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.63 times more return on investment than 84859DAA5. However, Citigroup is 1.59 times less risky than 84859DAA5. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SR 33 01 JUN 51 is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,090 in Citigroup on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 905.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 12.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 21.31% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. SR 33 01 JUN 51
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
84859DAA5 |
Citigroup and 84859DAA5 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and 84859DAA5
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and 84859DAA5 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, 84859DAA5 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 84859DAA5 will offset losses from the drop in 84859DAA5's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
84859DAA5 vs. IPG Photonics | 84859DAA5 vs. Amkor Technology | 84859DAA5 vs. Lithium Americas Corp | 84859DAA5 vs. Hudson Technologies |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities |