Correlation Between Citigroup and LEVEL
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and LEVEL 3 FING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and LEVEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of LEVEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and LEVEL.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and LEVEL
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and LEVEL is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and LEVEL 3 FING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LEVEL 3 FING and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with LEVEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LEVEL 3 FING has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and LEVEL go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and LEVEL
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 22.91 times less return on investment than LEVEL. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 31.97 times less risky than LEVEL. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. LEVEL 3 FING is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 5,588 in LEVEL 3 FING on December 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,513) from holding LEVEL 3 FING or give up 27.08% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 81.54% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. LEVEL 3 FING
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
LEVEL 3 FING |
Citigroup and LEVEL Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and LEVEL
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and LEVEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, LEVEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LEVEL will offset losses from the drop in LEVEL's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
LEVEL vs. Mitsubishi UFJ Lease | LEVEL vs. HF Sinclair Corp | LEVEL vs. FTAI Aviation Ltd | LEVEL vs. Federal Home Loan |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |