Correlation Between Citigroup and KINDER
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and KINDER.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and KINDER
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and KINDER is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and KINDER
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 73.99 times less return on investment than KINDER. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 59.11 times less risky than KINDER. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 9,720 in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (197.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 2.03% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 84.48% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY |
Citigroup and KINDER Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and KINDER
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
KINDER vs. Lithia Motors | KINDER vs. Tradeweb Markets | KINDER vs. BBB Foods | KINDER vs. Academy Sports Outdoors |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |