Correlation Between Citigroup and Boeing
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Boeing Co 2196, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Boeing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Boeing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Boeing.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Boeing
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Boeing is -0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Boeing Co 2196 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Boeing Co 2196 and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Boeing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Boeing Co 2196 has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Boeing go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Boeing
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 2.21 times more return on investment than Boeing. However, Citigroup is 2.21 times more volatile than Boeing Co 2196. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Boeing Co 2196 is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,129 in Citigroup on October 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,870 from holding Citigroup or generate 30.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.41% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Boeing Co 2196
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Boeing Co 2196 |
Citigroup and Boeing Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Boeing
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Boeing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Boeing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boeing will offset losses from the drop in Boeing's long position.Citigroup vs. Bank of Montreal | Citigroup vs. Canadian Imperial Bank | Citigroup vs. Bank of Nova | Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co |
Boeing vs. TFI International | Boeing vs. Kuya Silver | Boeing vs. Verra Mobility Corp | Boeing vs. Hooker Furniture |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |