Correlation Between Citigroup and Bausch
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Bausch Health Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Bausch and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Bausch. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Bausch.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Bausch
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Bausch is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Bausch Health Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bausch Health Companies and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Bausch. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bausch Health Companies has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Bausch go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Bausch
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.19 times more return on investment than Bausch. However, Citigroup is 5.14 times less risky than Bausch. It trades about 0.4 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bausch Health Companies is currently generating about -0.26 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,135 in Citigroup on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,034 from holding Citigroup or generate 14.49% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 77.78% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Bausch Health Companies
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Bausch Health Companies |
Citigroup and Bausch Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Bausch
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Bausch positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Bausch can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bausch will offset losses from the drop in Bausch's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Bausch vs. Futuretech II Acquisition | Bausch vs. Cementos Pacasmayo SAA | Bausch vs. Sandstorm Gold Ltd | Bausch vs. The Joint Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |