Correlation Between Citigroup and Trade Desk
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Trade Desk at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Trade Desk into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and The Trade Desk, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Trade Desk and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Trade Desk. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Trade Desk.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Trade Desk
0.22 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Trade is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and The Trade Desk in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Trade Desk and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Trade Desk. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Trade Desk has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Trade Desk go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Trade Desk
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.4 times more return on investment than Trade Desk. However, Citigroup is 2.51 times less risky than Trade Desk. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Trade Desk is currently generating about -0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,991 in Citigroup on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 42.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 0.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 96.83% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. The Trade Desk
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Trade Desk |
Citigroup and Trade Desk Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Trade Desk
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Trade Desk positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Trade Desk can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Trade Desk will offset losses from the drop in Trade Desk's long position.Citigroup vs. PJT Partners | Citigroup vs. National Bank Holdings | Citigroup vs. FB Financial Corp | Citigroup vs. Northrim BanCorp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.
Other Complementary Tools
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |