Correlation Between Citigroup and Mfs North

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Mfs North at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Mfs North into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Mfs North Carolina, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Mfs North and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Mfs North. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Mfs North.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Mfs North

CitigroupMfsDiversified AwayCitigroupMfsDiversified Away100%
-0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Mfs is -0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Mfs North Carolina in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs North Carolina and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Mfs North. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs North Carolina has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Mfs North go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Mfs North

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 6.18 times more return on investment than Mfs North. However, Citigroup is 6.18 times more volatile than Mfs North Carolina. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs North Carolina is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,205  in Citigroup on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  895.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 14.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Mfs North Carolina

 Performance 
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15OctNovDec 051015
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15C MBNCX
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15NovDecJanDecJan62646668707274
Mfs North Carolina 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs North Carolina has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Mfs North is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15NovDecJanDecJan10.7510.810.8510.910.9511

Citigroup and Mfs North Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15-5.61-4.2-2.79-1.38-0.02351.462.954.445.92 1234
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15C MBNCX
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Mfs North

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Mfs North positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Mfs North can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs North will offset losses from the drop in Mfs North's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Mfs North Carolina pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators