Correlation Between Citigroup and HUGE Old
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and HUGE Old at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and HUGE Old into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and HUGE Old, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and HUGE Old and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of HUGE Old. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and HUGE Old.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and HUGE Old
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and HUGE is -0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and HUGE Old in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on HUGE Old and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with HUGE Old. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of HUGE Old has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and HUGE Old go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and HUGE Old
If you would invest 7,135 in Citigroup on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,034 from holding Citigroup or generate 14.49% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 5.56% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. HUGE Old
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
HUGE Old |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Citigroup and HUGE Old Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and HUGE Old
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and HUGE Old positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, HUGE Old can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in HUGE Old will offset losses from the drop in HUGE Old's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
HUGE Old vs. Benchmark Botanics | HUGE Old vs. Speakeasy Cannabis Club | HUGE Old vs. City View Green | HUGE Old vs. Ravenquest Biomed |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |