Correlation Between Citigroup and General Engineering

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and General Engineering at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and General Engineering into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and General Engineering Public, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and General Engineering and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of General Engineering. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and General Engineering.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and General Engineering

0.13

Correlation Coefficient

Citigroup  General Engineering

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and General is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and General Engineering Public in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on General Engineering and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with General Engineering. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of General Engineering has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and General Engineering go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and General Engineering

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.17 times more return on investment than General Engineering. However, Citigroup is 5.72 times less risky than General Engineering. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. General Engineering Public is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,991  in Citigroup on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  42.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 0.6% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.41%
Values	Daily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  General Engineering Public

Citigroup

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Citigroup is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

General Engineering

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days General Engineering Public has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

Pair Trading with Citigroup and General Engineering

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and General Engineering positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, General Engineering can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in General Engineering will offset losses from the drop in General Engineering's long position.

The idea behind Citigroup and General Engineering Public pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.