Correlation Between Citigroup and Embracer Group
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Embracer Group AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Embracer Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Embracer Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Embracer Group.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Embracer Group
0.52 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Embracer is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Embracer Group AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Embracer Group AB and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Embracer Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Embracer Group AB has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Embracer Group go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Embracer Group
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.36 times less return on investment than Embracer Group. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 1.51 times less risky than Embracer Group. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Embracer Group AB is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,357 in Embracer Group AB on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 520.00 from holding Embracer Group AB or generate 22.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 96.97% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Embracer Group AB
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Embracer Group AB |
Citigroup and Embracer Group Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Embracer Group
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Embracer Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Embracer Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Embracer Group will offset losses from the drop in Embracer Group's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Embracer Group vs. Evolution AB | Embracer Group vs. Sinch AB | Embracer Group vs. Samhllsbyggnadsbolaget i Norden | Embracer Group vs. Stillfront Group AB |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.
Other Complementary Tools
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities |