Correlation Between Citigroup and Embracer Group

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Embracer Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Embracer Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Embracer Group AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Embracer Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Embracer Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Embracer Group.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Embracer Group

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Embracer is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Embracer Group AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Embracer Group AB and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Embracer Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Embracer Group AB has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Embracer Group go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Embracer Group

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.36 times less return on investment than Embracer Group. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 1.51 times less risky than Embracer Group. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Embracer Group AB is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,357  in Embracer Group AB on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  520.00  from holding Embracer Group AB or generate 22.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy96.97%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Embracer Group AB

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Embracer Group AB 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Embracer Group AB are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain basic indicators, Embracer Group sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Embracer Group Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Embracer Group

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Embracer Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Embracer Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Embracer Group will offset losses from the drop in Embracer Group's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Embracer Group AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities