Correlation Between Citigroup and Development Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Development Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Development Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Development Technologies Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Development Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Development Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Development Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Development Technologies

0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Development is 0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Development Technologies Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Development Technologies and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Development Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Development Technologies has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Development Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Development Technologies

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 89.99 times less return on investment than Development Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 8.03 times less risky than Development Technologies. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Development Technologies Corp is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  625.00  in Development Technologies Corp on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  287.00  from holding Development Technologies Corp or generate 45.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Development Technologies Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Development Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Development Technologies Corp are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating basic indicators, Development Technologies exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Development Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Development Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Development Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Development Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Development Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Development Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Development Technologies Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance