Correlation Between Citigroup and Inner Mongolia

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Inner Mongolia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Inner Mongolia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Inner Mongolia Junzheng, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Inner Mongolia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Inner Mongolia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Inner Mongolia.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Inner Mongolia

0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Inner is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Inner Mongolia Junzheng in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Inner Mongolia Junzheng and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Inner Mongolia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Inner Mongolia Junzheng has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Inner Mongolia go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Inner Mongolia

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.24 times more return on investment than Inner Mongolia. However, Citigroup is 4.11 times less risky than Inner Mongolia. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Inner Mongolia Junzheng is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,215  in Citigroup on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (115.00) from holding Citigroup or give up 1.59% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Inner Mongolia Junzheng

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Inner Mongolia Junzheng 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Inner Mongolia Junzheng are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Inner Mongolia sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Inner Mongolia Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Inner Mongolia

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Inner Mongolia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Inner Mongolia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Inner Mongolia will offset losses from the drop in Inner Mongolia's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Inner Mongolia Junzheng pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities