Correlation Between Bank of America and Peninsula Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Peninsula Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Peninsula Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and Peninsula Energy Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Peninsula Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Peninsula Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Peninsula Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Peninsula Energy

-0.59

Correlation Coefficient

Bank of America  Peninsula Energy

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Peninsula is -0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and Peninsula Energy Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Peninsula Energy and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Peninsula Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Peninsula Energy has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Peninsula Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Peninsula Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Verizon Communications is expected to generate 0.17 times more return on investment than Peninsula Energy. However, Verizon Communications is 5.76 times less risky than Peninsula Energy. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Peninsula Energy Limited is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,957  in Verizon Communications on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  73.00  from holding Verizon Communications or generate 1.84% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Verizon Communications  vs.  Peninsula Energy Limited

Verizon Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Peninsula Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Peninsula Energy Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Peninsula Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Peninsula Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Peninsula Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Peninsula Energy will offset losses from the drop in Peninsula Energy's long position.

The idea behind Verizon Communications and Peninsula Energy Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.