Correlation Between Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ainsworth Game Technology and Fisher Paykel Healthcare, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ainsworth Game with a short position of Fisher Paykel. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel.

Diversification Opportunities for Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel

0.12
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ainsworth and Fisher is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ainsworth Game Technology and Fisher Paykel Healthcare in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Ainsworth Game is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ainsworth Game Technology are associated (or correlated) with Fisher Paykel. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisher Paykel Healthcare has no effect on the direction of Ainsworth Game i.e., Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ainsworth Game is expected to generate 3.58 times less return on investment than Fisher Paykel. In addition to that, Ainsworth Game is 2.28 times more volatile than Fisher Paykel Healthcare. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fisher Paykel Healthcare is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,122  in Fisher Paykel Healthcare on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  342.00  from holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare or generate 10.95% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ainsworth Game Technology  vs.  Fisher Paykel Healthcare

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ainsworth Game Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ainsworth Game Technology are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable forward indicators, Ainsworth Game is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fisher Paykel Healthcare are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical indicators, Fisher Paykel may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ainsworth Game and Fisher Paykel positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ainsworth Game position performs unexpectedly, Fisher Paykel can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisher Paykel will offset losses from the drop in Fisher Paykel's long position.
The idea behind Ainsworth Game Technology and Fisher Paykel Healthcare pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated