Correlation Between Australia and Fisher Paykel

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Australia and Fisher Paykel at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Australia and Fisher Paykel into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Australia and Fisher Paykel and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Australia with a short position of Fisher Paykel. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Australia and Fisher Paykel.

Diversification Opportunities for Australia and Fisher Paykel

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Australia and Fisher is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Australia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Australia and New are associated (or correlated) with Fisher Paykel. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisher Paykel Healthcare has no effect on the direction of Australia i.e., Australia and Fisher Paykel go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Australia and Fisher Paykel

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Australia and New is expected to generate 0.91 times more return on investment than Fisher Paykel. However, Australia and New is 1.1 times less risky than Fisher Paykel. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fisher Paykel Healthcare is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,860  in Australia and New on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  85.00  from holding Australia and New or generate 2.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Australia and New  vs.  Fisher Paykel Healthcare

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Australia and New 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Australia and New has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Australia is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fisher Paykel Healthcare are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Fisher Paykel is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Australia and Fisher Paykel Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Australia and Fisher Paykel

The main advantage of trading using opposite Australia and Fisher Paykel positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Australia position performs unexpectedly, Fisher Paykel can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisher Paykel will offset losses from the drop in Fisher Paykel's long position.
The idea behind Australia and New and Fisher Paykel Healthcare pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets