Correlation Between Bell Food and Hilton Food

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bell Food and Hilton Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bell Food and Hilton Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bell Food Group and Hilton Food Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bell Food and Hilton Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bell Food with a short position of Hilton Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bell Food and Hilton Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Bell Food and Hilton Food

0.47

Correlation Coefficient

Bell Food  Hilton Food

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bell and Hilton is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bell Food Group and Hilton Food Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hilton Food Group and Bell Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bell Food Group are associated (or correlated) with Hilton Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hilton Food Group has no effect on the direction of Bell Food i.e., Bell Food and Hilton Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bell Food and Hilton Food

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bell Food Group is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than Hilton Food. However, Bell Food Group is 1.04 times less risky than Hilton Food. It trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hilton Food Group is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  26,700  in Bell Food Group on December 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,475) from holding Bell Food Group or give up 5.52% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bell Food Group  vs.  Hilton Food Group

Bell Food Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Bell Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Bell Food is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Hilton Food Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Hilton Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Hilton Food is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Pair Trading with Bell Food and Hilton Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bell Food and Hilton Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bell Food position performs unexpectedly, Hilton Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hilton Food will offset losses from the drop in Hilton Food's long position.

The idea behind Bell Food Group and Hilton Food Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.