Correlation Between SM Energy and Litigation Capital

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SM Energy and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SM Energy and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between SM Energy Co and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SM Energy and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SM Energy with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SM Energy and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for SM Energy and Litigation Capital

0.84

Correlation Coefficient

SM Energy  Litigation Capital

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between 0KZA and Litigation is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SM Energy Co and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and SM Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SM Energy Co are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of SM Energy i.e., SM Energy and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between SM Energy and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon SM Energy Co is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Litigation Capital. However, SM Energy Co is 1.0 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,746  in SM Energy Co on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (665.00) from holding SM Energy Co or give up 17.75% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	96.77%
Values	Daily Returns

SM Energy Co  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

SM Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days SM Energy Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Pair Trading with SM Energy and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite SM Energy and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SM Energy position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.

The idea behind SM Energy Co and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.