Massimo Baratto - Under Armour Executive Vice President, Chief Consumer Officer
| UA Stock | USD 6.10 0.09 1.45% |
President
Mr. Massimo Baratto is Vice President, Managing Director Europe of the Company. Baratto brings nearly 30 years of international experience from a variety of industries, brands and regions. Most recently, he served as CEO of the Oberalp Group, the Italianbased owner of Dynafit, Pomoca, Salewa and Wild Country and international distributor of Under Armour, Speedo, Fischer, Spyder, Barts and Rip Curl. Since joining Oberalp in 2001, he served in various senior management roles, leading its portfolio of outdoor footwear, apparel and equipment brands. Prior to Oberalp, Baratto served in managing director roles for food and snack companies ZUEGG and UNICHIPS, respectively. since 2021.
| Age | 58 |
| Tenure | 4 years |
| Address | 1020 Hull Street, Baltimore, MD, United States, 21230 |
| Phone | 410 468 2512 |
| Web | https://www.underarmour.com |
Under Armour Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0305 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0305. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of (0.0612) %, which implies that it produced no returns to current stockholders. Under Armour's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Under Armour manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.1. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.22. At present, Under Armour's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 2.3 B, whereas Intangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 7.6 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
| Richelle Luther | Columbia Sportswear | 55 | |
| Angelo LaGrega | VF Corporation | N/A | |
| Vanessa LeFebvre | Hanesbrands | 46 | |
| Mark Fischer | PVH Corp | 62 | |
| Joseph Boyle | Columbia Sportswear | 44 | |
| Stephen Murray | VF Corporation | 59 | |
| Andrew Smith | Ralph Lauren Corp | 49 | |
| Paul Fipps | Under Armour A | 45 | |
| David Kozel | PVH Corp | 63 | |
| Lorenzo Moretti | Hanesbrands | N/A | |
| Howard Upchurch | Hanesbrands | 59 | |
| Velia Carboni | VF Corporation | 54 | |
| Joseph Cavaliere | Hanesbrands | 62 | |
| Curtis Holtz | VF Corporation | 56 | |
| Colin Browne | Under Armour A | 60 | |
| Julie Fuller | PVH Corp | 52 | |
| Sophia HwangJudiesch | PVH Corp | N/A | |
| David Bortolussi | Hanesbrands | 49 | |
| Kelly McGinnis | Levi Strauss Co | 56 | |
| Harmit Singh | Levi Strauss Co | 61 | |
| Seth Ellis | Levi Strauss Co | 62 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.0612 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0305 |
Under Armour C Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Under Armour's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Under Armour inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Under. The board's role is to monitor Under Armour's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Under Armour's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Under Armour's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Kevin Plank, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Aditya Maheshwari, Controller Officer | ||
| Tchernavia Rocker, Chief People and Administrative Officer | ||
| Amanda Miller, Chief Officer | ||
| David Bergman, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Stephanie Pugliese, President North America | ||
| Westley Moore, Independent Director | ||
| Eric Aumen, Chief Officer | ||
| Mohamed Erian, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Patrik Frisk, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| James Dausch, Chief Officer | ||
| Colin Browne, President of Global Sourcing | ||
| Massimo Baratto, Executive Vice President, Chief Consumer Officer | ||
| Frederick III, Chief VP | ||
| Mohamed ElErian, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Tushar Goculdas, Managing Operations | ||
| Lance Allega, Senior Development | ||
| Jason Archer, Managing Pacific | ||
| Harvey Sanders, Independent Director | ||
| Kevin Haley, Chief Officer | ||
| Alessandro Pestel, Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Paul Fipps, Chief Experience Officer | ||
| Alvin Krongard, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Eric Olson, Independent Director | ||
| Kasey Jarvis, Chief Design Officer | ||
| Mehri JD, Chief Secretary | ||
| Danny Miles, Executive Officer | ||
| David CPA, Chief Officer | ||
| Jerri DeVard, Independent Director | ||
| Douglas Coltharp, Independent Director | ||
| John Stanton, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| David Gibbs, Independent Director | ||
| George Bodenheimer, Independent Director | ||
| Karen Katz, Independent Director | ||
| Lisa Collier, Chief Product Officer | ||
| Stephanie Linnartz, CEO President |
Under Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Under Armour a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.0612 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0305 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.02) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 3.33 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 206.58 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 9.11 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 75.90 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 7.82 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 17.81 X |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Under Armour C. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.
Is Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.99) | Earnings Share (0.29) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.06) | Return On Assets |
The market value of Under Armour C is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Under Armour is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.