Under Armour Company Insiders
UA Stock | USD 6.19 0.04 0.64% |
Under Armour's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Under Armour C stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Under Armour employs about 6.8 K people. The company is managed by 36 executives with a total tenure of roughly 190 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 188.89 employees per reported executive.
Patrik Frisk CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Kevin Plank Chairman Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-12-02 | David Bergman | Disposed 30000 @ 9.09 | View | ||
2024-11-18 | Mehri Shadman | Disposed 9639 @ 8.81 | View | ||
2024-11-15 | Mehri Shadman | Disposed 17240 @ 8.76 | View |
Monitoring Under Armour's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Under |
Under Armour's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Under Armour's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Under will maintain a workforce of about 6800 employees by April 2025.Under Armour's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Under Armour C, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Under Armour by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2016-01-12 | Senator John Hoeven | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify |
Under Armour Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0305 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0305. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of (0.0612) %, which implies that it produced no returns to current stockholders. Under Armour's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Under Armour manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.1. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.22. At present, Under Armour's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 2.3 B, whereas Intangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 7.6 M.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 467 M, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 452.3 M.
Under Armour Workforce Comparison
Under Armour C is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 129,880. Under Armour holds roughly 6,800 in number of employees claiming about 5% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Under Armour Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of (0.02) %, which may indicate that it does not properly execute on its own pricing strategies. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.04 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.04.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.53 | 0.5035 |
|
|
Under Armour Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Under Armour insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Under Armour's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Under Armour insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-06-01 | 2.4 | 12 | 5 | 2,660,812 | 161,507 |
2024-03-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 53,017 | 293,486 |
2023-12-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 102,489 | 4,152 |
2023-06-01 | 1.4545 | 16 | 11 | 1,602,451 | 16,092,108 |
2023-03-01 | 0.9091 | 10 | 11 | 1,336,323 | 224,649 |
2022-12-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 60,800 | 0.00 |
2022-06-01 | 9.5 | 19 | 2 | 674,809 | 158,564 |
2022-03-01 | 1.3333 | 16 | 12 | 834,690 | 339,113 |
2021-12-01 | 0.3333 | 6 | 18 | 7,295 | 1,322,210 |
2021-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 167,708 | 223,011 |
2021-06-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 64,003 | 11,340 |
2021-03-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 1,382,852 | 200,600 |
2020-12-01 | 1.2857 | 9 | 7 | 31,507 | 52,058 |
2020-09-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 14,313 | 54,819 |
2020-03-01 | 1.4286 | 20 | 14 | 869,618 | 196,164 |
2019-12-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 88,877 | 28,482 |
2019-09-01 | 1.8 | 9 | 5 | 9,165 | 114,030 |
2019-06-01 | 2.0 | 24 | 12 | 153,412 | 84,678 |
2019-03-01 | 1.45 | 29 | 20 | 1,402,547 | 194,785 |
2018-12-01 | 2.0 | 10 | 5 | 18,388 | 13,694 |
2018-09-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 7,949 | 54,710 |
2018-06-01 | 1.6923 | 22 | 13 | 147,077 | 104,236 |
2018-03-01 | 0.6667 | 22 | 33 | 947,651 | 265,058 |
2017-12-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 12,392 | 18,740 |
2017-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 531,847 | 6,542 |
2017-06-01 | 1.1905 | 25 | 21 | 131,537 | 91,944 |
2017-03-01 | 1.68 | 42 | 25 | 1,493,106 | 221,850 |
2016-12-01 | 0.7692 | 10 | 13 | 83,816 | 13,785 |
2016-09-01 | 0.8235 | 14 | 17 | 352,749 | 249,321 |
2016-06-01 | 0.5106 | 24 | 47 | 92,633 | 1,318,931 |
2016-03-01 | 2.875 | 23 | 8 | 323,045 | 153,937 |
2015-12-01 | 0.3143 | 22 | 70 | 688,565 | 2,470,352 |
2015-09-01 | 2.8 | 14 | 5 | 30,903 | 50,400 |
2015-06-01 | 0.9643 | 27 | 28 | 399,121 | 1,022,500 |
2015-03-01 | 0.9459 | 35 | 37 | 1,307,884 | 1,375,339 |
2014-12-01 | 0.5882 | 20 | 34 | 673,085 | 1,992,217 |
2014-09-01 | 0.4444 | 24 | 54 | 955,006 | 2,002,579 |
2014-06-01 | 0.5278 | 19 | 36 | 542,310 | 1,313,725 |
2014-03-01 | 0.4722 | 34 | 72 | 3,685,138 | 3,976,928 |
2013-12-01 | 0.4359 | 17 | 39 | 303,533 | 799,365 |
2013-09-01 | 0.4286 | 18 | 42 | 340,839 | 722,510 |
2013-06-01 | 0.4706 | 16 | 34 | 272,777 | 646,038 |
2013-03-01 | 0.4865 | 18 | 37 | 508,630 | 619,287 |
2012-12-01 | 0.3846 | 15 | 39 | 282,297 | 748,833 |
2012-09-01 | 0.25 | 18 | 72 | 323,200 | 785,964 |
2012-06-01 | 0.2149 | 26 | 121 | 108,613 | 441,134 |
2012-03-01 | 0.1899 | 15 | 79 | 107,187 | 385,982 |
2011-12-01 | 0.3297 | 30 | 91 | 381,885 | 740,252 |
2011-09-01 | 0.2797 | 33 | 118 | 284,204 | 708,670 |
2011-06-01 | 0.3457 | 28 | 81 | 288,972 | 642,255 |
2011-03-01 | 0.3143 | 22 | 70 | 364,881 | 746,606 |
2010-12-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 957.28 | 171,000 |
2010-09-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 1,288 | 36,000 |
2010-06-01 | 4.3333 | 13 | 3 | 250,055 | 95,786 |
2010-03-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 165,779 | 33,121 |
2009-09-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 8,010 | 14,118 |
2009-06-01 | 1.0 | 16 | 16 | 171,660 | 338,763 |
2009-03-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 83,465 | 87,422 |
2008-12-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 10,636 | 3,000 |
2008-09-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 25,899 | 18,368 |
2008-06-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 15,020 | 12,000 |
2008-03-01 | 10.0714 | 141 | 14 | 382,995 | 173,397 |
2007-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 475,278 | 2,975,000 |
2007-09-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 32,212 | 56,000 |
2007-03-01 | 0.9167 | 11 | 12 | 191,590 | 213,786 |
2006-12-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 35,100 | 60,100 |
Under Armour Notable Stakeholders
An Under Armour stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Under Armour often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Under Armour's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Under Armour's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Patrik Frisk | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Stephanie Linnartz | CEO President | Profile | |
Kevin Plank | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Colin Browne | President of Global Sourcing | Profile | |
Massimo Baratto | Executive Vice President, Chief Consumer Officer | Profile | |
John Stanton | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
David Bergman | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Westley Moore | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mohamed ElErian | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Harvey Sanders | Independent Director | Profile | |
Alvin Krongard | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Eric Olson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jerri DeVard | Independent Director | Profile | |
Douglas Coltharp | Independent Director | Profile | |
David Gibbs | Independent Director | Profile | |
George Bodenheimer | Independent Director | Profile | |
Karen Katz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Frederick III | Chief VP | Profile | |
Aditya Maheshwari | Controller Officer | Profile | |
Tchernavia Rocker | Chief People and Administrative Officer | Profile | |
Amanda Miller | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Stephanie Pugliese | President North America | Profile | |
Eric Aumen | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Mohamed Erian | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
James Dausch | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Tushar Goculdas | Managing Operations | Profile | |
Lance Allega | Senior Development | Profile | |
Jason Archer | Managing Pacific | Profile | |
Kevin Haley | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Alessandro Pestel | Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Paul Fipps | Chief Experience Officer | Profile | |
Kasey Jarvis | Chief Design Officer | Profile | |
Mehri JD | Chief Secretary | Profile | |
Danny Miles | Executive Officer | Profile | |
David CPA | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Lisa Collier | Chief Product Officer | Profile |
About Under Armour Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Under Armour C often depends on how effective the management is. Under Armour management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Under management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Under management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.08 | 0.10 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.14 | 0.22 | |
Return On Assets | 0.07 | 0.09 | |
Return On Equity | 0.17 | 0.25 |
Please note, the presentation of Under Armour's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Under Armour's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Under Armour's management manipulating its earnings.
Under Armour Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Under Armour use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Under Armour within its industry.Under Armour Manpower Efficiency
Return on Under Armour Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 838.5K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 158.4M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 34.1K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 6.4M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 249.7K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 47.2M |
Complementary Tools for Under Stock analysis
When running Under Armour's price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |