Charles Shivery - Portland General Independent Director
| POR Stock | USD 48.06 0.35 0.73% |
Director
Mr. Charles W. Shivery is an Independent Director of Portland General Electric Company. Mr. Shivery served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Northeast Utilities, New Englands largest utility system, from March 2004 until his retirement in April 2012 following the completion of the merger between Northeast Utilities and NSTAR. Following his retirement, he served as chairman of the board of Northeast Utilities from April 2012 to October 2013, and as a member of the board from October 2013 to May 2014. From 2007 to 2012, Mr. Shivery also served as chairman of the boards of several whollyowned subsidiaries of Northeast Utilities, including The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Western Massachusetts Electric Company, and Yankee Gas Services Company. Prior to joining Northeast Utilities in 2002, Mr. Shivery worked for 29 years at Constellation Energy Group, Inc. and its whollyowned subsidiary, Baltimore Gas Electric Company, where he served in various executive positions, including CoPresident of Constellation Energy Group. From July 2009 to April 2018, Mr. Shivery served as a director of Webster Financial Corporation since 2014.
| Age | 74 |
| Tenure | 10 years |
| Address | 121 South West Salmon Street, Portland, OR, United States, 97204 |
| Phone | 503 464 8000 |
| Web | https://www.portlandgeneral.com |
Portland General Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0306 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0306 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0991 %, implying that it generated $0.0991 on every 100 dollars invested. Portland General's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Portland General manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/28/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.03. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.06. At this time, Portland General's Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/28/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.03, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 5.5 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| John Sznewajs | CMS Energy | 53 | |
| William Spence | Pinnacle West Capital | 64 | |
| Richard Fox | Pinnacle West Capital | 73 | |
| Scott McLean | CenterPoint Energy | 63 | |
| Phillip Smith | CenterPoint Energy | 69 | |
| Myrna Soto | CMS Energy | 52 | |
| Annette Elg | IDACORP | 64 | |
| Donald Goshorn | DTE Energy | N/A | |
| James Trevathan | Pinnacle West Capital | 67 | |
| Gail McGovern | DTE Energy | 69 | |
| Wendy Cloonan | CenterPoint Energy | 41 | |
| Dennis Johnson | IDACORP | 66 | |
| Craig Ivey | Ameren Corp | 58 | |
| Mark Murray | DTE Energy | 66 | |
| Stephen Wilson | Ameren Corp | 71 | |
| Leo Mackay | Ameren Corp | 59 | |
| Steven Lipstein | Ameren Corp | 65 | |
| Justin Forsberg | IDACORP | N/A | |
| Barbara Tuckfield | DTE Energy | N/A | |
| Kathryn Munro | Pinnacle West Capital | 72 | |
| James Vandenberghe | DTE Energy | 71 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0991 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0306 |
Portland General Electric Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Portland General's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Portland General inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Portland. The board's role is to monitor Portland General's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Portland General's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Portland General's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Dawn Farrell, Independent Director | ||
| Nora Arkonovich, Co Sec | ||
| Michael Millegan, Independent Director | ||
| John Kochavatr, Vice President - Information Technology and Chief Information Officer | ||
| Jardon Jaramillo, Treasury Relations | ||
| John Ballantine, Independent Director | ||
| Brett Sims, Vice President - Strategy, Regulation and Energy Supply | ||
| W Robertson, Vice President - Public Policy and Corporate Resiliency | ||
| James Ajello, Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
| Kristin Stathis, Vice President - Customer Service Operations | ||
| John McFarland, Vice President - Customer Solutions, Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Rodney Brown, Independent Director | ||
| Larry Bekkedahl, Vice President - Grid Architecture, Integration and Systems Operations | ||
| Anne Mersereau, Vice President Human Resources, Diversity, Inclusion and Administration | ||
| Bradley Jenkins, Vice President Power Supply Generation | ||
| Lisa Kaner, Corporate Compliance Officer, Vice President General Counsel | ||
| James Torgerson, Independent Director | ||
| Kathryn Jackson, Independent Director | ||
| Benjamin Felton, Executive COO | ||
| James Lobdell, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - Finance, Treasurer | ||
| Sujata Pagedar, Company Counsel | ||
| Michael Lewis, Independent Director | ||
| Nik Blosser, VP Affairs | ||
| M Pelton, Independent Director | ||
| Kirby Dyess, Independent Director | ||
| Marie Huber, Independent Director | ||
| Mark Ganz, Independent Director | ||
| Charles Shivery, Independent Director | ||
| Angelica Espinosa, VP Counsel | ||
| Maria Pope, Sr. VP of Power Supply, Power Operations and Resource Strategy | ||
| Maria JD, Senior Officer | ||
| Nick White, Investor Executive | ||
| Christopher Liddle, Corporate Finance and Investor Relations Manager & Assistant Treasurer | ||
| Jack Davis, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Maria Espinosa, Senior Officer | ||
| Neil Nelson, Independent Director | ||
| Joseph Trpik, Senior CFO |
Portland Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Portland General a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0991 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0306 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.10 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 9.74 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 105.46 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.46 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 99.54 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.98 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 25.47 X |
Pair Trading with Portland General
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Portland General position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Portland General will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Portland Stock
| 0.63 | D | Dominion Energy | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | ED | Consolidated Edison Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | FE | FirstEnergy | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Portland General could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Portland General when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Portland General - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Portland General Electric to buy it.
The correlation of Portland General is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Portland General moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Portland General Electric moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Portland General can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Portland Stock Analysis
When running Portland General's price analysis, check to measure Portland General's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Portland General is operating at the current time. Most of Portland General's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Portland General's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Portland General's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Portland General to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.