Sharmila Mulligan - ConocoPhillips Independent Director
| COP Stock | USD 97.08 1.74 1.76% |
Director
Ms. Sharmila Mulligan serves as Independent Director of the Company. Ms. Mulligan is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of ClearStory Data Inc., a modern data analytics company enabling businessoriented insights from disparate data. Ms. Mulligan has served as ClearStorys Chief Executive Officer since inception in September 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Ms. Mulligan served as Executive Vice President for Aster Data Systems, Inc. until its acquisition by Teradata Corporationrationration. Prior to Aster Data, Ms. Mulligan was a Vice President of Software Solutions for HP Inc. Prior to HP, Ms. Mulligan was Executive Vice President of Products and Marketing at Opsware Inc. from 2002 until its eventual acquisition by HP in 2007. Prior to Opsware Inc., Ms. Mulligan led Product Management and held Vice President positions at Netscape Communications, Microsoft, and General Magic. Ms. Mulligan is on the board of Lattice Engines, Inc. and an advisor to, and investor in, numerous enterprise software and consumer technology companies. since 2017.
| Age | 55 |
| Tenure | 8 years |
| Address | 925 North Eldridge Parkway, Houston, TX, United States, 77079-2703 |
| Phone | 281 293 1000 |
| Web | https://www.conocophillips.com |
ConocoPhillips Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.084 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.084 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1621 %, implying that it generated $0.1621 on every 100 dollars invested. ConocoPhillips' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well ConocoPhillips manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, ConocoPhillips' Return On Capital Employed is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 02/26/2025, Return On Equity is likely to grow to 6.87, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.04. As of 02/26/2025, Change To Liabilities is likely to grow to about 851.4 M, while Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 11 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Frances Vallejo | Coterra Energy | 56 | |
| Rodney Chase | Hess Corporation | 74 | |
| William Montgomery | APA Corporation | 58 | |
| Andrew Gould | Occidental Petroleum | 74 | |
| Amy Nelson | APA Corporation | 51 | |
| Marc Lipschultz | Hess Corporation | 51 | |
| Leonard Coleman | Hess Corporation | 71 | |
| William Klesse | Occidental Petroleum | 74 | |
| Barbara Baumann | Devon Energy | 66 | |
| Annell Bay | APA Corporation | 64 | |
| Hans Helmerich | Coterra Energy | 62 | |
| Kelt Kindick | Devon Energy | 65 | |
| Gary Hu | Occidental Petroleum | 32 | |
| David McManus | Hess Corporation | 66 | |
| Mary Ricciardello | Devon Energy | 63 | |
| John Bethancourt | Devon Energy | 68 | |
| Robert Mosbacher | Devon Energy | 68 | |
| William Schrader | Hess Corporation | 61 | |
| Robert Henry | Devon Energy | 65 | |
| Daniel Rabun | APA Corporation | 65 | |
| Rene Joyce | APA Corporation | 72 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.084 |
ConocoPhillips Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the ConocoPhillips' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: ConocoPhillips inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of ConocoPhillips. The board's role is to monitor ConocoPhillips' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. ConocoPhillips' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, ConocoPhillips' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Timothy Leach, Executive Vice President - Lower 48, Director | ||
| R Walker, Independent Director | ||
| Ellen Sanctis, Senior Vice President - Corporate Relations | ||
| Jody Freeman, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Niblock, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Kontessa HaynesWelsh, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| John Faraci, Independent Director | ||
| Christopher Delk, Controller VP | ||
| Andrew Lundquist, Senior Vice President - Government Affairs | ||
| David Seaton, Independent Director | ||
| Arjun Murti, Independent Director | ||
| Heather Hrap, Senior Services | ||
| BSc CFA, President Supply | ||
| Matthew Fox, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Heather Sirdashney, Vice President Human Resources and Real Estate and Facilities Services | ||
| William Bullock, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Mark Keener, VP Relations | ||
| Chris Conway, Head Operations | ||
| Ellen DeSanctis, VP of Investor Relations and Communications | ||
| David Chenier, Pres Kingdom | ||
| Ryan Lance, Chairman, CEO and Chairman of Executive Committee | ||
| Caroline Devine, Independent Director | ||
| Michael Hatfield, President - Alaska, Canada and Europe | ||
| Andrew OBrien, Commercial, Strategy | ||
| Dodd DeCamp, PresidentMiddle Region | ||
| Catherine Brooks, Vice President Controller | ||
| Nicholas Olds, Executive Vice President - Global Operations | ||
| JD IV, Senior Development | ||
| Gay Evans, Independent Director | ||
| Donald Wallette, Executive VP of Commercial, Bus. Devel. and Planning | ||
| Charles Bunch, Independent Director | ||
| Jeffrey Joerres, Independent Director | ||
| Eric Mullins, Independent Director | ||
| Kirk Johnson, Senior Operations | ||
| William McRaven, Independent Director | ||
| Dominic Macklon, Executive Vice President - Strategy, Sustainability and Technology | ||
| Shannon Kinney, Chief Counsel | ||
| Kelly Rose, Senior Vice President - Legal, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Kelly JD, Senior Counsel | ||
| Steiner Vage, President Europe | ||
| Sharmila Mulligan, Independent Director |
ConocoPhillips Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is ConocoPhillips a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.084 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.26 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 143.95 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 1.27 B | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.27 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 83.15 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 13.15 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 9.12 X |
Pair Trading with ConocoPhillips
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if ConocoPhillips position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ConocoPhillips will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with ConocoPhillips Stock
Moving against ConocoPhillips Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to ConocoPhillips could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace ConocoPhillips when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back ConocoPhillips - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling ConocoPhillips to buy it.
The correlation of ConocoPhillips is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as ConocoPhillips moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if ConocoPhillips moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for ConocoPhillips can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for ConocoPhillips Stock Analysis
When running ConocoPhillips' price analysis, check to measure ConocoPhillips' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy ConocoPhillips is operating at the current time. Most of ConocoPhillips' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of ConocoPhillips' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move ConocoPhillips' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of ConocoPhillips to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.