W R Company Insiders
WRB Stock | USD 61.79 1.03 1.64% |
About 83 percent of all W R's insiders are aggressively buying. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that quite a large number of W R Berkley insiders are, at present, very bullish. W R employs about 31 people. The company is managed by 31 executives with a total tenure of roughly 306 years, averaging almost 9.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive.
William Berkley CEO CEO and President COO, Director and Member of Executive Committee |
James Shiel President Executive Vice President - Investments |
Insider Sentiment 83
Aggressively Buying
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2023-09-08 | Lois Frankel | Disposed @ 41.27 | |||
2023-07-14 | Lois Frankel | Acquired @ 39.29 | |||
2023-05-26 | Lois Frankel | Acquired @ 37.43 | |||
2023-05-01 | Lois Frankel | Acquired @ 39.82 | |||
2022-08-01 | Mark Ellwood Brockbank | Acquired 2151 @ 41.23 | View | ||
2022-07-29 | Mark Ellwood Brockbank | Acquired 6849 @ 41.33 | View |
Monitoring W R's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of W R's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of W R Berkley. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe W R's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
WRB |
W R's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with W R's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that WRB will maintain a workforce of about 2980 employees by March 2025.W R Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.036 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.036 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2206 %, implying that it generated $0.2206 on every 100 dollars invested. W R's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well W R manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.16. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.12. At present, W R's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 31.5 B, whereas Net Tangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 5.6 B.The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 398.4 M. The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.7 B
W R Workforce Comparison
W R Berkley is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Financials industry is at this time estimated at about 96,229. W R adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Financials industry.
W R Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.13 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.19 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.19 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.55 | 0.65 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.1288 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.088 | 0.13 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.17 | 0.166 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.16 | 0.1518 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.22 | 0.2092 |
|
|
W R Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific W R insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on W R's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, W R insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 310,752 | 12,782 |
2024-06-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 25,340 | 0.00 |
2023-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 225,407 | 9,295 |
2022-09-01 | 1.8333 | 11 | 6 | 249,455 | 10,240 |
2021-12-01 | 0.4167 | 5 | 12 | 54,005 | 133,010 |
2021-09-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 187,113 | 7,844 |
2020-09-01 | 1.5833 | 19 | 12 | 213,147 | 9,147 |
2020-03-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 6,716 | 5,767 |
2019-12-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 99,438 | 99,869 |
2019-09-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 481,114 | 20,059 |
2019-06-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 42,204 | 77,000 |
2019-03-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 762.00 | 0.00 |
2018-12-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 616.00 | 550.00 |
2018-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 57,690 | 2,553 |
2018-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 26,503 | 22,098 |
2018-03-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 337.00 | 399,900 |
2017-12-01 | 0.1 | 2 | 20 | 342.00 | 941,616 |
2017-09-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 355.00 | 18,856 |
2017-06-01 | 3.6667 | 11 | 3 | 27,417 | 21.00 |
2017-03-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 327.00 | 34.00 |
2016-12-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 410.00 | 2,600 |
2016-06-01 | 11.0 | 11 | 1 | 27,505 | 0.00 |
2015-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 420.00 | 429,328 |
2015-06-01 | 11.0 | 11 | 1 | 35,937 | 0.00 |
2015-03-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 527.00 | 20,410 |
2014-03-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 640.00 | 61.00 |
2013-09-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 877.00 | 297,315 |
2012-12-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 84,466 | 102,705 |
2012-06-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 27,748 | 0.00 |
2012-03-01 | 0.9 | 9 | 10 | 615,783 | 507,213 |
2011-12-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 810,600 | 749,469 |
2011-06-01 | 11.0 | 11 | 1 | 27,783 | 5,500 |
2011-03-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 1,282,035 | 2,059,804 |
2010-12-01 | 0.8571 | 6 | 7 | 1,319,213 | 2,137,515 |
2010-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 852.00 | 2,000 |
2010-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 61,700 | 0.00 |
2010-03-01 | 3.25 | 26 | 8 | 831,925 | 164,180 |
2009-12-01 | 0.8 | 8 | 10 | 357,590 | 565,084 |
2009-09-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 13,478 | 33,904 |
2009-06-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 27,058 | 500.00 |
2008-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 34,167 | 68,834 |
2008-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 81,000 | 120,779 |
2008-06-01 | 13.0 | 26 | 2 | 981,290 | 491,014 |
2008-03-01 | 0.25 | 5 | 20 | 210,153 | 310,625 |
2007-06-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 1,810,375 | 2,755,462 |
2007-03-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
2006-12-01 | 0.125 | 2 | 16 | 1,034,175 | 1,052,350 |
2006-06-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 13,500 | 1,500 |
2006-03-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 290,939 | 291,139 |
2005-09-01 | 0.1053 | 6 | 57 | 155,130 | 393,443 |
2005-06-01 | 0.6875 | 11 | 16 | 72,280 | 105,244 |
2004-03-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 11,813 | 11,813 |
2003-12-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 267,875 | 129,375 |
2003-09-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 12,375 | 24,750 |
W R Notable Stakeholders
A W R stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as W R often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. W R's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting W R's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
David Brosnan | President and Chief Executive Officer of W. R. Berkley Syndicate Management Limited | Profile | |
William Berkley | CEO and President COO, Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
W Berkley | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
James Shiel | Executive Vice President - Investments | Profile | |
Philip Welt | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary Secretary | Profile | |
Richard Baio | CFO, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer | Profile | |
Lucille Sgaglione | Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Karen Horvath | Vice President - External Financial Communications | Profile | |
Maria Ferre | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mark Brockbank | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jack Nusbaum | Independent Director | Profile | |
Christopher Augostini | Independent Director | Profile | |
Leigh Pusey | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mary Farrell | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mark Shapiro | Independent Director | Profile | |
Ronald Blaylock | Independent Director | Profile | |
Liberatore Iannarone | Senior Counsel | Profile | |
Carol LaPunzina | Senior Resources | Profile | |
James Hastings | President - W. R. Berkley Syndicate Management Limited | Profile | |
Linda Eppolito | President of Berkley Oil & Gas | Profile | |
Jonathan Levine | VP Officer | Profile | |
Nelson Tavares | Executive Vice President | Profile | |
David Higley | President of Berkley Fire & Marine | Profile | |
Maria Rangel | Independent Director | Profile | |
Andrew Robinson | President - Construction Solutions | Profile | |
Marina Barg | Senior Vice President - claims | Profile | |
James Gilbert | Executive Vice President - Enterprise Technology | Profile | |
Jeanne Fenster | President - Operating Unit | Profile | |
Robert Standen | Executive Vice President - Operating Units | Profile | |
Jonathan Talisman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Scott Mansolillo | Senior Officer | Profile |
About W R Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as W R Berkley often depends on how effective the management is. W R management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of WRB management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the WRB management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.10 | 0.12 | |
Return On Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
Return On Equity | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Please note, the presentation of W R's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, W R's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of W R's management manipulating its earnings.
W R Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as W R use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare W R within its industry.W R Manpower Efficiency
Return on W R Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 441.6M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 441.6M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 56.6M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 56.6M |
Complementary Tools for WRB Stock analysis
When running W R's price analysis, check to measure W R's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy W R is operating at the current time. Most of W R's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of W R's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move W R's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of W R to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets |