W R Company Insiders

WRB Stock  USD 61.79  1.03  1.64%   
About 83 percent of all W R's insiders are aggressively buying. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that quite a large number of W R Berkley insiders are, at present, very bullish. W R employs about 31 people. The company is managed by 31 executives with a total tenure of roughly 306 years, averaging almost 9.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive.
William Berkley  CEO
CEO and President COO, Director and Member of Executive Committee
James Shiel  President
Executive Vice President - Investments

Insider Sentiment 83

 Aggressively Buying

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2023-09-08Lois FrankelDisposed @ 41.27
2023-07-14Lois FrankelAcquired @ 39.29
2023-05-26Lois FrankelAcquired @ 37.43
2023-05-01Lois FrankelAcquired @ 39.82
2022-08-01Mark Ellwood BrockbankAcquired 2151 @ 41.23View
2022-07-29Mark Ellwood BrockbankAcquired 6849 @ 41.33View
Monitoring W R's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.

Acquired vs Disposed

Filed vs Not Filed

Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of W R's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of W R Berkley. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe W R's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
  
Check out Your Current Watchlist to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in W R Berkley. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area.

W R's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with W R's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that WRB will maintain a workforce of about 2980 employees by March 2025.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

W R Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of 0.036 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.036 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2206 %, implying that it generated $0.2206 on every 100 dollars invested. W R's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well W R manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.16. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.12. At present, W R's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 31.5 B, whereas Net Tangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 5.6 B.
The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 398.4 M. The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.7 B

W R Workforce Comparison

W R Berkley is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Financials industry is at this time estimated at about 96,229. W R adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Financials industry.

W R Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.13 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.19 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.19 of operating income.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.550.65
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Net Profit Margin0.140.1288
Significantly Up
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.0880.13
Way Down
Very volatile
Pretax Profit Margin0.170.166
Fairly Up
Pretty Stable
Return On Assets0.160.1518
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.220.2092
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile

W R Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific W R insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on W R's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, W R insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2024-09-01
1.0
6
6
 310,752 
 12,782 
2024-06-01
10.0
10
1
 25,340 
 0.00 
2023-09-01
1.0
6
6
 225,407 
 9,295 
2022-09-01
1.8333
11
6
 249,455 
 10,240 
2021-12-01
0.4167
5
12
 54,005 
 133,010 
2021-09-01
0.75
9
12
 187,113 
 7,844 
2020-09-01
1.5833
19
12
 213,147 
 9,147 
2020-03-01
8.0
8
1
 6,716 
 5,767 
2019-12-01
1.75
7
4
 99,438 
 99,869 
2019-09-01
2.0
14
7
 481,114 
 20,059 
2019-06-01
19.0
19
1
 42,204 
 77,000 
2019-03-01
3.0
6
2
 762.00 
 0.00 
2018-12-01
2.0
4
2
 616.00 
 550.00 
2018-09-01
1.5
9
6
 57,690 
 2,553 
2018-06-01
3.0
12
4
 26,503 
 22,098 
2018-03-01
0.5
3
6
 337.00 
 399,900 
2017-12-01
0.1
2
20
 342.00 
 941,616 
2017-09-01
0.2857
2
7
 355.00 
 18,856 
2017-06-01
3.6667
11
3
 27,417 
 21.00 
2017-03-01
2.0
2
1
 327.00 
 34.00 
2016-12-01
1.0
2
2
 410.00 
 2,600 
2016-06-01
11.0
11
1
 27,505 
 0.00 
2015-12-01
2.0
2
1
 420.00 
 429,328 
2015-06-01
11.0
11
1
 35,937 
 0.00 
2015-03-01
0.5
3
6
 527.00 
 20,410 
2014-03-01
3.0
3
1
 640.00 
 61.00 
2013-09-01
4.0
4
1
 877.00 
 297,315 
2012-12-01
0.7
7
10
 84,466 
 102,705 
2012-06-01
12.0
12
1
 27,748 
 0.00 
2012-03-01
0.9
9
10
 615,783 
 507,213 
2011-12-01
0.8182
9
11
 810,600 
 749,469 
2011-06-01
11.0
11
1
 27,783 
 5,500 
2011-03-01
0.875
7
8
 1,282,035 
 2,059,804 
2010-12-01
0.8571
6
7
 1,319,213 
 2,137,515 
2010-09-01
2.0
2
1
 852.00 
 2,000 
2010-06-01
7.0
14
2
 61,700 
 0.00 
2010-03-01
3.25
26
8
 831,925 
 164,180 
2009-12-01
0.8
8
10
 357,590 
 565,084 
2009-09-01
0.25
3
12
 13,478 
 33,904 
2009-06-01
6.5
13
2
 27,058 
 500.00 
2008-12-01
0.3333
1
3
 34,167 
 68,834 
2008-09-01
0.5
2
4
 81,000 
 120,779 
2008-06-01
13.0
26
2
 981,290 
 491,014 
2008-03-01
0.25
5
20
 210,153 
 310,625 
2007-06-01
3.3333
10
3
 1,810,375 
 2,755,462 
2007-03-01
1.0
1
1
 1,000,000 
 1,000,000 
2006-12-01
0.125
2
16
 1,034,175 
 1,052,350 
2006-06-01
9.0
9
1
 13,500 
 1,500 
2006-03-01
1.0
5
5
 290,939 
 291,139 
2005-09-01
0.1053
6
57
 155,130 
 393,443 
2005-06-01
0.6875
11
16
 72,280 
 105,244 
2004-03-01
1.0
3
3
 11,813 
 11,813 
2003-12-01
2.0
6
3
 267,875 
 129,375 
2003-09-01
0.2
1
5
 12,375 
 24,750 

W R Notable Stakeholders

A W R stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as W R often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. W R's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting W R's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
David BrosnanPresident and Chief Executive Officer of W. R. Berkley Syndicate Management LimitedProfile
William BerkleyCEO and President COO, Director and Member of Executive CommitteeProfile
W BerkleyPresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
James ShielExecutive Vice President - InvestmentsProfile
Philip WeltExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary SecretaryProfile
Richard BaioCFO, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer, TreasurerProfile
Lucille SgaglioneExecutive Vice PresidentProfile
Karen HorvathVice President - External Financial CommunicationsProfile
Maria FerreIndependent DirectorProfile
Mark BrockbankIndependent DirectorProfile
Jack NusbaumIndependent DirectorProfile
Christopher AugostiniIndependent DirectorProfile
Leigh PuseyIndependent DirectorProfile
Mary FarrellIndependent DirectorProfile
Mark ShapiroIndependent DirectorProfile
Ronald BlaylockIndependent DirectorProfile
Liberatore IannaroneSenior CounselProfile
Carol LaPunzinaSenior ResourcesProfile
James HastingsPresident - W. R. Berkley Syndicate Management LimitedProfile
Linda EppolitoPresident of Berkley Oil & GasProfile
Jonathan LevineVP OfficerProfile
Nelson TavaresExecutive Vice PresidentProfile
David HigleyPresident of Berkley Fire & MarineProfile
Maria RangelIndependent DirectorProfile
Andrew RobinsonPresident - Construction SolutionsProfile
Marina BargSenior Vice President - claimsProfile
James GilbertExecutive Vice President - Enterprise TechnologyProfile
Jeanne FensterPresident - Operating UnitProfile
Robert StandenExecutive Vice President - Operating UnitsProfile
Jonathan TalismanIndependent DirectorProfile
Scott MansolilloSenior OfficerProfile

About W R Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as W R Berkley often depends on how effective the management is. W R management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of WRB management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the WRB management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.15  0.16 
Return On Capital Employed 0.10  0.12 
Return On Assets 0.15  0.16 
Return On Equity 0.21  0.22 
Please note, the presentation of W R's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, W R's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of W R's management manipulating its earnings.

W R Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as W R use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare W R within its industry.

W R Manpower Efficiency

Return on W R Manpower

Revenue Per Employee441.6M
Revenue Per Executive441.6M
Net Income Per Employee56.6M
Net Income Per Executive56.6M

Complementary Tools for WRB Stock analysis

When running W R's price analysis, check to measure W R's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy W R is operating at the current time. Most of W R's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of W R's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move W R's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of W R to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets