Morgan Stanley Company Insiders
MS Stock | USD 138.95 2.11 1.54% |
Morgan Stanley's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that vertually all Morgan Stanley insiders are, at present, panicking. Morgan Stanley employs about 80.5 K people. The company is managed by 40 executives with a total tenure of roughly 221 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 2011.95 employees per reported executive.
James Gorman Chairman Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer |
Eric Grossman President Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2025-01-24 | Julie Johnson | Disposed @ 137.85 | |||
2025-01-21 | Raja Akram | Disposed 17500 @ 136.01 | View | ||
2024-10-17 | Stephen J Luczo | Disposed 60000 @ 119.17 | View | ||
2024-09-04 | John James | Disposed @ 100.15 | |||
2024-07-26 | Mandell Crawley | Disposed 3500 @ 105.25 | View | ||
2024-07-18 | Raja Akram | Disposed 7500 @ 106.37 | View | ||
2024-07-17 | Robert H Herz | Disposed 1000 @ 106.62 | View | ||
2024-05-14 | Mandell Crawley | Disposed 6954 @ 99.61 | View | ||
2024-04-18 | James P Gorman | Disposed 100000 @ 90.21 | View | ||
2024-04-17 | Charles Aubrey Smith III | Disposed 11200 @ 90.09 | View |
Monitoring Morgan Stanley's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Morgan |
Morgan Stanley's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Morgan Stanley, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Morgan Stanley by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-12-06 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-11-11 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-09-06 | Representative John James | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-09-02 | Representative John James | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-07-14 | Representative Michael Patrick Guest | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-11-02 | Representative Michael C Burgess | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Morgan Stanley Management Team Effectiveness
At this time, Morgan Stanley's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.01 in 2025, whereas Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.02 in 2025. At this time, Morgan Stanley's Total Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Non Current Assets Total is likely to gain to about 923.6 B in 2025, whereas Other Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 319.6 B in 2025. Morgan Stanley's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Morgan Stanley manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to gain to about 12.7 B in 2025, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 1.2 B in 2025.
Morgan Stanley Workforce Comparison
Morgan Stanley is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Financials industry is now estimated at about 132,039. Morgan Stanley totals roughly 80,478 in number of employees claiming about 61% of equities under Financials industry.
Morgan Stanley Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.22 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.37 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.37.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.72 | 0.85 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.12 | 0.2177 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.48 | 0.4805 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.2861 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0096 | 0.0088 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.17 | 0.1279 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Morgan Stanley insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Morgan Stanley's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Morgan Stanley insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-03-01 | 0.4348 | 10 | 23 | 343,476 | 524,917 |
2024-12-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 2,121 | 61,115 |
2024-09-01 | 0.1111 | 1 | 9 | 200,000 | 335,952 |
2024-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 31,692 | 138,154 |
2024-03-01 | 0.5357 | 15 | 28 | 1,108,913 | 1,044,755 |
2023-12-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 338,558 | 1,238 |
2023-06-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 38,136 | 64,392 |
2023-03-01 | 0.5 | 17 | 34 | 1,176,783 | 1,264,929 |
2022-12-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 2,694 | 635.00 |
2022-06-01 | 2.0 | 16 | 8 | 60,214 | 31,427 |
2022-03-01 | 0.7143 | 20 | 28 | 1,618,496 | 942,869 |
2021-12-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 2,580 | 51,549 |
2021-06-01 | 5.3333 | 16 | 3 | 5,204,452 | 93,162 |
2021-03-01 | 0.5806 | 18 | 31 | 1,439,896 | 964,262 |
2020-12-01 | 0.7692 | 10 | 13 | 66,475 | 1,024,387 |
2020-06-01 | 3.0 | 21 | 7 | 116,057 | 18,492 |
2020-03-01 | 0.88 | 22 | 25 | 970,473 | 6,088,855 |
2019-12-01 | 0.4286 | 6 | 14 | 9,054 | 5,931,289 |
2019-09-01 | 1.8 | 9 | 5 | 179.37 | 9,472,670 |
2019-06-01 | 3.6 | 18 | 5 | 76,736 | 7,024,850 |
2019-03-01 | 0.6071 | 17 | 28 | 1,177,779 | 8,779,317 |
2018-12-01 | 1.3333 | 12 | 9 | 386,609 | 7,397,730 |
2018-09-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 394,128 | 6,735,378 |
2018-06-01 | 1.7 | 17 | 10 | 307,311 | 6,703,139 |
2018-03-01 | 0.5926 | 16 | 27 | 691,833 | 893,191 |
2017-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 5,668 | 121,673 |
2017-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 214,488 | 454,728 |
2017-06-01 | 2.8333 | 17 | 6 | 277,610 | 427,829 |
2017-03-01 | 0.6667 | 16 | 24 | 1,287,102 | 1,431,635 |
2016-12-01 | 0.5588 | 19 | 34 | 1,601,398 | 3,396,441 |
2016-09-01 | 0.2632 | 5 | 19 | 330,870 | 903,252 |
2016-06-01 | 3.4 | 17 | 5 | 113,314 | 28,579 |
2016-03-01 | 0.7727 | 17 | 22 | 1,368,368 | 756,551 |
2015-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 6,476 | 3,548 |
2015-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 0.05 | 42,464 |
2015-06-01 | 1.25 | 15 | 12 | 75,489 | 176,301 |
2015-03-01 | 0.8095 | 17 | 21 | 1,204,743 | 835,161 |
2014-12-01 | 0.75 | 12 | 16 | 617,843 | 669,452 |
2014-09-01 | 0.4211 | 8 | 19 | 1,139,500 | 1,369,743 |
2014-06-01 | 2.0 | 20 | 10 | 229,590 | 173,101 |
2014-03-01 | 0.8333 | 20 | 24 | 1,031,274 | 770,340 |
2013-12-01 | 0.75 | 6 | 8 | 5,796 | 28,125 |
2013-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 7,146 | 23,655 |
2013-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 118,943 | 116,178 |
2013-03-01 | 0.4828 | 14 | 29 | 2,616,544 | 759,204 |
2012-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 8,414 | 12,027 |
2012-06-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 184,273 | 2,397 |
2012-03-01 | 0.5 | 9 | 18 | 1,339,309 | 382,845 |
2011-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 9,329 | 12,994 |
2011-09-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 185,000 | 8,000 |
2011-06-01 | 2.3333 | 14 | 6 | 385,572,117 | 7,904,198 |
2011-03-01 | 1.0 | 22 | 22 | 2,316,525 | 207,916 |
2010-12-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 34,132 | 217,614 |
2010-09-01 | 0.0833 | 1 | 12 | 40,339 | 25,468,174 |
2010-06-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 83,668 | 26,166 |
2010-03-01 | 0.5 | 15 | 30 | 1,384,051 | 1,200,523 |
2009-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 79,000 | 35,471 |
2009-09-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 7,298 | 21,241 |
2009-06-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 46,676,444 | 754,807 |
2008-12-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 115,727 | 310,464,033 |
2008-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 34.81 | 18,965 |
2008-06-01 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 | 69,953 | 10,350 |
2007-12-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 607,477 | 1,384,972 |
2007-09-01 | 0.0253 | 2 | 79 | 12,552 | 67,906 |
2007-06-01 | 1.7391 | 40 | 23 | 86,662 | 148,307 |
2007-03-01 | 0.1429 | 6 | 42 | 413,937 | 883,721 |
2006-12-01 | 1.2174 | 28 | 23 | 1,698,935 | 201,483 |
2006-09-01 | 0.6154 | 8 | 13 | 7,794 | 74,695 |
2006-06-01 | 1.0588 | 18 | 17 | 123,668 | 42,022 |
2006-03-01 | 0.9286 | 13 | 14 | 865,684 | 619,808 |
2005-12-01 | 1.4545 | 32 | 22 | 2,801,940 | 97,957 |
2005-09-01 | 1.0 | 7 | 7 | 200,136 | 106,135 |
2005-06-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 712,918 | 8,000 |
2005-03-01 | 1.1786 | 33 | 28 | 882,783 | 1,403,834 |
2004-12-01 | 0.8846 | 23 | 26 | 2,419,559 | 984,803 |
2004-09-01 | 0.4286 | 12 | 28 | 1,671,400 | 2,542,501 |
2004-03-01 | 0.3 | 18 | 60 | 1,900,882 | 1,621,973 |
2003-12-01 | 0.7193 | 41 | 57 | 3,274,312 | 667,709 |
2003-09-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 2,806,485 | 236,113 |
Morgan Stanley Notable Stakeholders
A Morgan Stanley stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Morgan Stanley often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Morgan Stanley's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Morgan Stanley's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
James Gorman | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Clint Gartin | Chairman Banking | Profile | |
Eric Grossman | Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Jonathan Pruzan | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Keishi Hotsuki | Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer | Profile | |
Jeffrey Brodsky | Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Sharon Yeshaya | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Thomas Glocer | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Judith Miscik | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mary Schapiro | Independent Director | Profile | |
Dennis Nally | Independent Director | Profile | |
Hutham Olayan | Independent Director | Profile | |
Rayford Wilkins | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nobuyuki Hirano | Director | Profile | |
Robert Herz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Perry Traquina | Independent Director | Profile | |
Alistair Darling | Independent Director | Profile | |
Elizabeth Corley | Independent Director | Profile | |
Simon Evenson | Managing Director | Profile | |
Stanislav Liberman | Managing Director | Profile | |
Robyn Goldschmid | Managing Director | Profile | |
Stephen Popovchak | Managing Director | Profile | |
Simon Herrmann | Head Group | Profile | |
Sachin Wagle | CoHead India | Profile | |
Takeshi Ogasawara | Director | Profile | |
Shelley Leibowitz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Hironori Kamezawa | Director | Profile | |
Erika James | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Wilson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Edward Pick | Head - Institutional Securities | Profile | |
Mandell Crawley | Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
Marc Sgaraglino | Managing Director | Profile | |
Sarah CFA | MD Centers | Profile | |
Andrew Saperstein | Head - Wealth Management | Profile | |
Robert Rooney | Head of Technology - Operations and Firm Resilience | Profile | |
James Boustead | Compliance Legal | Profile | |
Michael Pizzi | Head Technology | Profile | |
Raja Akram | Deputy Officer | Profile | |
Daniel Simkowitz | Head of Investment Management | Profile | |
Stephen Luczo | Independent Director | Profile |
About Morgan Stanley Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Morgan Stanley often depends on how effective the management is. Morgan Stanley management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Morgan management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Morgan management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
Return On Assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
Return On Equity | 0.13 | 0.17 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Morgan Stanley's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Morgan Stanley. Check Morgan Stanley's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Morgan Stanley's management manipulating its earnings.
Morgan Stanley Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Morgan Stanley use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Morgan Stanley within its industry.Morgan Stanley Manpower Efficiency
Return on Morgan Stanley Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 764.1K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 1.5B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 166.4K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 334.8M |
Additional Tools for Morgan Stock Analysis
When running Morgan Stanley's price analysis, check to measure Morgan Stanley's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Morgan Stanley is operating at the current time. Most of Morgan Stanley's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Morgan Stanley's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Morgan Stanley's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Morgan Stanley to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.