Comfort Systems Company Insiders
FIX Stock | USD 352.15 4.64 1.30% |
Comfort Systems' insiders are aggressively selling. The current insiders' sentiment regarding investing in Comfort Systems USA stock implies that vertually all insiders are panicking. Comfort Systems employs about 18.3 K people. The company is managed by 28 executives with a total tenure of roughly 202 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 653.57 employees per reported executive.
Brian Lane CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Franklin Myers Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2025-01-13 | Robert Bresnahan, Jr. | Disposed @ 438.46 | |||
2024-11-22 | T Mckenna Trent | Disposed 4000 @ 484.81 | View | ||
2024-11-13 | Brian E Lane | Disposed 15000 @ 448.88 | View | ||
2024-11-05 | Pablo G Mercado | Disposed 2500 @ 409.46 | View | ||
2024-10-30 | Franklin Myers | Disposed 12000 @ 390.18 | View | ||
2024-10-28 | Vance W Tang | Disposed 2700 @ 390 | View | ||
2024-08-27 | Darcy Anderson | Disposed 3546 @ 336.19 | View | ||
2024-08-20 | William George III | Disposed 5845 @ 332.16 | View | ||
2024-08-14 | Brian E Lane | Disposed 15000 @ 329.55 | View | ||
2024-06-05 | Vance W Tang | Disposed 3473 @ 310 | View | ||
2024-05-15 | Vance W Tang | Disposed 988 @ 343 | View | ||
2024-05-07 | Darcy Anderson | Disposed 3500 @ 344.9 | View |
Monitoring Comfort Systems' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Comfort |
Comfort Systems' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Comfort Systems' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Comfort will maintain a workforce of slightly above 18300 employees by April 2025.Comfort Systems' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Comfort Systems USA, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Comfort Systems by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2025-02-14 | Representative Rob Bresnahan | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Comfort Systems Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1164 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1164 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.3503 %, implying that it generated $0.3503 on every 100 dollars invested. Comfort Systems' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Comfort Systems manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to rise to 0.16 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to rise to 0.37 in 2025. At this time, Comfort Systems' Return On Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Asset Turnover is likely to rise to 1.50 in 2025, whereas Other Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 34.1 M in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to rise to about 40.9 M in 2025. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to rise to about 297 M in 2025
Comfort Systems Workforce Comparison
Comfort Systems USA is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is currently estimated at about 243,307. Comfort Systems holds roughly 18,300 in number of employees claiming about 8% of equities under Industrials industry.
Comfort Systems Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.07 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.12 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.12 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.21 | 0.2101 |
|
|
Comfort Systems Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Comfort Systems insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Comfort Systems' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Comfort Systems insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-03-01 | 2.0 | 12 | 6 | 28,906 | 5,202 |
2024-12-01 | 0.2 | 2 | 10 | 4,000 | 50,055 |
2024-09-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 385.00 | 26,707 |
2024-06-01 | 0.3913 | 9 | 23 | 4,482 | 22,049 |
2024-03-01 | 0.7333 | 11 | 15 | 26,523 | 71,852 |
2023-12-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 26,287 | 12,353 |
2023-06-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 8,520 | 16,635 |
2023-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 45,895 | 15,528 |
2022-12-01 | 0.4 | 4 | 10 | 4,329 | 60,453 |
2022-09-01 | 0.1111 | 1 | 9 | 3,420 | 90,996 |
2022-06-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 16,991 | 45,958 |
2022-03-01 | 1.1429 | 8 | 7 | 48,552 | 14,674 |
2021-12-01 | 0.4 | 6 | 15 | 96,801 | 347,545 |
2021-06-01 | 0.5455 | 24 | 44 | 88,607 | 173,104 |
2021-03-01 | 0.8333 | 15 | 18 | 114,907 | 140,451 |
2020-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 20,000 | 42,000 |
2020-09-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 49,277 | 128,620 |
2020-06-01 | 0.9412 | 16 | 17 | 88,971 | 55,659 |
2020-03-01 | 2.0 | 8 | 4 | 65,212 | 11,197 |
2019-12-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 32,500 | 55,453 |
2019-06-01 | 0.9231 | 12 | 13 | 36,596 | 8,421 |
2019-03-01 | 0.9444 | 17 | 18 | 85,367 | 73,067 |
2018-12-01 | 0.8333 | 5 | 6 | 21,000 | 32,000 |
2018-09-01 | 0.6 | 6 | 10 | 62,182 | 125,288 |
2018-06-01 | 0.6744 | 29 | 43 | 118,216 | 178,400 |
2018-03-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 136,617 | 53,101 |
2017-12-01 | 0.6 | 12 | 20 | 46,090 | 116,638 |
2017-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 5,482 | 2,000 |
2017-06-01 | 0.6111 | 11 | 18 | 54,580 | 64,814 |
2017-03-01 | 1.3 | 26 | 20 | 202,981 | 121,347 |
2016-09-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 11,500 | 10,000 |
2016-06-01 | 0.625 | 20 | 32 | 80,347 | 117,838 |
2016-03-01 | 1.8 | 18 | 10 | 165,324 | 80,946 |
2015-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 16,500 | 26,592 |
2015-09-01 | 0.7273 | 8 | 11 | 70,003 | 151,337 |
2015-06-01 | 0.5714 | 24 | 42 | 182,448 | 227,191 |
2015-03-01 | 2.8333 | 17 | 6 | 180,308 | 76,000 |
2014-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 17,000 | 24,000 |
2014-06-01 | 0.6923 | 9 | 13 | 67,271 | 19,604 |
2014-03-01 | 7.5 | 15 | 2 | 263,679 | 87,128 |
2013-12-01 | 0.25 | 9 | 36 | 130,249 | 374,781 |
2013-09-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 76,847 | 147,694 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5714 | 20 | 35 | 187,500 | 222,155 |
2013-03-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 199,857 | 22,000 |
2012-12-01 | 0.3333 | 4 | 12 | 33,750 | 78,382 |
2012-09-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 10,000 | 49,196 |
2012-06-01 | 0.4706 | 8 | 17 | 75,221 | 32,805 |
2011-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 10,000 | 10,882 |
2011-06-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 70,000 | 55,155 |
2011-03-01 | 4.0 | 12 | 3 | 243,858 | 10,000 |
2010-12-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 107,500 | 159,615 |
2010-06-01 | 1.8333 | 11 | 6 | 55,000 | 16,296 |
2010-03-01 | 0.8333 | 15 | 18 | 277,004 | 58,809 |
2009-12-01 | 0.3 | 3 | 10 | 65,000 | 209,039 |
2009-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 110,000 | 149,780 |
2009-06-01 | 0.4615 | 12 | 26 | 115,000 | 134,389 |
2009-03-01 | 1.2857 | 9 | 7 | 137,466 | 80,731 |
2008-12-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 4,000 | 11,369 |
2008-09-01 | 0.5 | 17 | 34 | 263,500 | 511,045 |
2008-06-01 | 0.8 | 16 | 20 | 167,216 | 209,043 |
2008-03-01 | 1.2857 | 9 | 7 | 130,733 | 91,208 |
2007-09-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 26,000 | 102,800 |
2007-06-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 87,500 | 98,481 |
2007-03-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 121,521 | 109,138 |
2006-12-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 26,500 | 409,535 |
2006-06-01 | 0.5172 | 15 | 29 | 307,000 | 683,400 |
2006-03-01 | 0.2727 | 3 | 11 | 37,500 | 131,722 |
2005-12-01 | 0.375 | 3 | 8 | 10,000 | 53,150 |
2005-06-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 76,500 | 40,556 |
2005-03-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 16,500 | 30,250 |
2004-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 270,000 | 4,000 |
2004-03-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 15,000 | 33,300 |
2003-12-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 35,200 | 6,050 |
Comfort Systems Notable Stakeholders
A Comfort Systems stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Comfort Systems often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Comfort Systems' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Comfort Systems' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Brian Lane | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Franklin Myers | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Julie Shaeff | Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Joseph Nichter | President Southwest | Profile | |
Dean Tillison | Regional President | Profile | |
Terrence Young | Senior Vice President of Service | Profile | |
Thomas Tanner | Regional President | Profile | |
Brian Evans | Regional President | Profile | |
William George | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Laura Howell | Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
William III | Executive CFO | Profile | |
Trent JD | Executive COO | Profile | |
Trent McKenna | Sr. VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Alan Krusi | Independent Director | Profile | |
Vance Tang | Independent Director | Profile | |
Constance Skidmore | Independent Director | Profile | |
Pablo Mercado | Independent Director | Profile | |
Darcy Anderson | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Sandbrook | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Schultz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Herman Bulls | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Goldberg | VP Controller | Profile | |
Byran Farris | VP Integration | Profile | |
Laura JD | General VP | Profile | |
Briston Blair | Senior Strategy | Profile | |
Julie CPA | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Terrence Reed | Senior Development | Profile | |
John III | Senior Service | Profile |
About Comfort Systems Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Comfort Systems USA often depends on how effective the management is. Comfort Systems management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Comfort management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Comfort management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.35 | 0.37 | |
Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.12 | |
Return On Equity | 0.31 | 0.32 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Comfort Systems' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Comfort Systems USA. Check Comfort Systems' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Comfort Systems' management manipulating its earnings.
Comfort Systems Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Comfort Systems use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Comfort Systems within its industry.Comfort Systems Manpower Efficiency
Return on Comfort Systems Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 384K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 251M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 28.5K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 18.7M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 11.3K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 7.4M |
Additional Tools for Comfort Stock Analysis
When running Comfort Systems' price analysis, check to measure Comfort Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Comfort Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Comfort Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Comfort Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Comfort Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Comfort Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.