Curtiss Wright Company Insiders
CW Stock | USD 314.41 0.50 0.16% |
Slightly above 80 percent of Curtiss Wright's insiders are selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that a fairly large number of Curtiss Wright insiders are, at present, terrified. Curtiss Wright employs about 8.8 K people. The company is managed by 28 executives with a total tenure of roughly 161 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 314.29 employees per reported executive.
David Adams Chairman Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer |
K Farkas President Vice President - Finance, Corporate Controller |
Insider Sentiment 20
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2025-02-05 | John C Watts | Disposed 622 @ 347.05 | View | ||
2025-01-06 | Paul J Ferdenzi | Acquired 34 @ 304.12 | View | ||
2024-12-11 | Lynn M Bamford | Disposed 7129 @ 368.8 | View | ||
2024-11-05 | John C Watts | Disposed 412 @ 359.55 | View | ||
2024-08-16 | Glenda J Minor | Disposed 500 @ 302.8 | View | ||
2024-07-03 | K Christopher Farkas | Acquired 51 @ 232.62 | View | ||
2024-06-03 | Kevin Rayment | Disposed 8415 @ 281.67 | View | ||
2024-05-23 | S Marce Fuller | Disposed 5300 @ 281.04 | View | ||
2024-03-22 | Paul J Ferdenzi | Disposed 2500 @ 250 | View | ||
2024-03-19 | Lynn M Bamford | Disposed 2620 @ 243.6 | View |
Monitoring Curtiss Wright's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Curtiss |
Curtiss Wright's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Curtiss Wright's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Curtiss will maintain a workforce of slightly above 8800 employees by March 2025.Curtiss Wright Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0748 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0748. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.1695 %, which means that it produced $0.1695 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Curtiss Wright's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Curtiss Wright manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to climb to 0.16 in 2025, whereas Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.08 in 2025. At this time, Curtiss Wright's Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Current Assets Total is likely to climb to about 3.3 B in 2025, whereas Intangible Assets are likely to drop slightly above 370.9 M in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to climb to about 47.1 M in 2025. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to climb to about 355.4 M in 2025
Curtiss Wright Workforce Comparison
Curtiss Wright is rated third in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is currently estimated at about 59,110. Curtiss Wright retains roughly 8,800 in number of employees claiming about 15% of equities under Industrials industry.
Curtiss Wright Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.13 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.21 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.21.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.4 | 0.3696 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.1673 |
|
|
Curtiss Wright Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Curtiss Wright insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Curtiss Wright's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Curtiss Wright insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-03-01 | 2.625 | 21 | 8 | 42,493 | 17,155 |
2024-12-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 1,230 | 7,815 |
2024-09-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 366.00 | 500.00 |
2024-06-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 19,999 | 19,015 |
2024-03-01 | 1.625 | 39 | 24 | 91,295 | 58,056 |
2023-09-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 613.00 | 6,948 |
2023-03-01 | 1.7619 | 37 | 21 | 52,474 | 26,475 |
2022-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 315.00 | 59.00 |
2022-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 167.00 | 0.00 |
2022-03-01 | 1.1304 | 26 | 23 | 44,782 | 66,365 |
2021-12-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 19,045 | 10,562 |
2021-09-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 705.00 | 2,200 |
2021-06-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 29,088 | 53,151 |
2021-03-01 | 1.0 | 31 | 31 | 48,006 | 46,927 |
2020-03-01 | 3.0 | 18 | 6 | 41,436 | 14,879 |
2019-12-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 40,563 | 31,019 |
2019-09-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 349.00 | 33,982 |
2019-06-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 507.00 | 10,813 |
2019-03-01 | 1.6 | 16 | 10 | 53,328 | 37,174 |
2018-12-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 41,645 | 24,745 |
2018-09-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 752.00 | 2,500 |
2018-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 167.00 | 1,250 |
2018-03-01 | 1.3846 | 18 | 13 | 87,781 | 87,178 |
2017-12-01 | 0.4211 | 16 | 38 | 56,504 | 131,447 |
2017-09-01 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 12,223 | 36,284 |
2017-06-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 664.00 | 1,300 |
2017-03-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 81,153 | 59,798 |
2016-12-01 | 0.875 | 21 | 24 | 195,001 | 337,967 |
2016-09-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 1,465 | 15,297 |
2016-06-01 | 0.3462 | 9 | 26 | 99,640 | 246,930 |
2016-03-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 106,881 | 65,727 |
2015-12-01 | 1.0588 | 18 | 17 | 130,922 | 190,018 |
2015-09-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 3,684 | 4,967 |
2015-03-01 | 1.4545 | 16 | 11 | 137,912 | 103,221 |
2014-12-01 | 0.6667 | 16 | 24 | 134,583 | 245,302 |
2014-09-01 | 0.8667 | 13 | 15 | 11,415 | 19,330 |
2014-06-01 | 0.3 | 12 | 40 | 83,672 | 191,728 |
2014-03-01 | 1.2647 | 43 | 34 | 211,781 | 311,458 |
2013-12-01 | 0.7 | 21 | 30 | 134,315 | 221,086 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0 | 16 | 16 | 13,006 | 18,680 |
2013-06-01 | 0.875 | 14 | 16 | 74,256 | 39,361 |
2013-03-01 | 5.0 | 25 | 5 | 91,371 | 2,064 |
2012-12-01 | 0.5455 | 18 | 33 | 95,369 | 163,608 |
2012-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 5,373 | 3,198 |
2012-06-01 | 1.3333 | 12 | 9 | 4,037 | 4,797 |
2012-03-01 | 1.5882 | 27 | 17 | 100,359 | 40,391 |
2011-12-01 | 0.75 | 15 | 20 | 88,977 | 53,506 |
2011-09-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 6,609 | 4,204 |
2011-06-01 | 0.8889 | 16 | 18 | 30,511 | 21,654 |
2011-03-01 | 2.75 | 22 | 8 | 23,180 | 7,839 |
2010-12-01 | 1.8889 | 17 | 9 | 277,574 | 14,960 |
2010-06-01 | 1.125 | 9 | 8 | 28,889 | 16,225 |
2010-03-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 19,361 | 1,348 |
2009-12-01 | 2.5 | 15 | 6 | 245,876 | 10,978 |
2009-09-01 | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 6,737 | 5,336 |
2009-06-01 | 1.2857 | 9 | 7 | 95,126 | 40,289 |
2008-09-01 | 1.5 | 18 | 12 | 37,758 | 68,039 |
2007-12-01 | 3.8333 | 23 | 6 | 210,427 | 104,324 |
2007-09-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 4,377 | 1,900 |
2007-06-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 4,566 | 7,134 |
2007-03-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 51,286 | 80,000 |
2006-12-01 | 3.25 | 26 | 8 | 197,004 | 73,381 |
2006-09-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 5,073 | 2,903 |
2006-06-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 21,972 | 49,684 |
2006-03-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 20,984 | 31,640 |
2005-12-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 44,400 | 62,760 |
2005-09-01 | 2.75 | 22 | 8 | 28,745 | 83,058 |
2005-06-01 | 3.0 | 9 | 3 | 9,373 | 13,872 |
2005-03-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 4,768 | 36,894 |
2004-12-01 | 16.0 | 16 | 1 | 56,525 | 778.00 |
2004-09-01 | 15.0 | 30 | 2 | 30,377 | 536.00 |
2004-06-01 | 2.3333 | 21 | 9 | 251,178 | 168,689 |
2004-03-01 | 0.4375 | 7 | 16 | 34,653 | 114,086 |
2003-12-01 | 0.3043 | 7 | 23 | 17,158 | 61,383 |
2003-09-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 2,382 | 400.00 |
Curtiss Wright Notable Stakeholders
A Curtiss Wright stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Curtiss Wright often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Curtiss Wright's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Curtiss Wright's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Lynn Bamford | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
David Adams | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
K Farkas | Vice President - Finance, Corporate Controller | Profile | |
Paul Ferdenzi | Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Harry Jakubowitz | Vice President Treasurer | Profile | |
Christopher Farkas | Vice President Corporate Controller | Profile | |
Glenn Tynan | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Thomas Quinly | Chief Operating Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Christopher CPA | VP CFO | Profile | |
Dean Flatt | Independent Director | Profile | |
Bruce Hoechner | Independent Director | Profile | |
Peter Wallace | Independent Director | Profile | |
S Fuller | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
John Nathman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Robert Rivet | Independent Director | Profile | |
Albert Smith | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Robert CPA | VP Treasurer | Profile | |
George McDonald | General VP | Profile | |
Robert Freda | Vice President Treasurer | Profile | |
Larry Peach | Pres Segment | Profile | |
James Ryan | Director Relations | Profile | |
Kevin Rayment | President - Commercial / Industrial Segment | Profile | |
Tony Jones | Sr Controller | Profile | |
Karl Kleiderer | VP Devel | Profile | |
Gary Ogilby | Vice President Corporate Controller | Profile | |
Anthony Moraco | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Watts | Vice Development | Profile | |
Glenda Minor | Independent Director | Profile |
About Curtiss Wright Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Curtiss Wright often depends on how effective the management is. Curtiss Wright management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Curtiss management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Curtiss management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.14 | 0.08 | |
Return On Assets | 0.08 | 0.07 | |
Return On Equity | 0.17 | 0.10 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Curtiss Wright's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Curtiss Wright. Check Curtiss Wright's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Curtiss Wright's management manipulating its earnings.
Curtiss Wright Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Curtiss Wright use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Curtiss Wright within its industry.Curtiss Wright Manpower Efficiency
Return on Curtiss Wright Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 354.7K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 111.5M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 46K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 14.5M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 85.6K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 26.9M |
Additional Tools for Curtiss Stock Analysis
When running Curtiss Wright's price analysis, check to measure Curtiss Wright's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Curtiss Wright is operating at the current time. Most of Curtiss Wright's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Curtiss Wright's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Curtiss Wright's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Curtiss Wright to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.