Baker Hughes Earnings Estimate
| BKR Stock | USD 42.84 1.10 2.64% |
Baker Hughes Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
By analyzing Baker Hughes' earnings estimates, investors can diagnose different trends across Baker Hughes' analyst sentiment over time as well as compare current estimates against different timeframes. At this time, Baker Hughes' Pretax Profit Margin is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 03/17/2025, Operating Profit Margin is likely to grow to 0.12, while Gross Profit is likely to drop slightly above 4.7 B.
Baker |
Baker Hughes Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Baker Hughes' earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Baker Hughes is estimated to be 0.4861 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.45 to a high of 0.53. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Baker Hughes Co is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.45 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.53 Highest |
Baker Hughes Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Baker Hughes' value are higher than the current market price of the Baker Hughes stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Baker Hughes is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Baker Hughes' stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 27 | 90.52% | 0.7 | 0.4861 | 2.98 |
Baker Hughes Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Baker Hughes analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Baker Hughes' stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we recommend analyzing not only Baker Hughes' upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Baker Hughes Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Baker Hughes Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Baker Hughes refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Baker Hughes Co predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Baker Hughes, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Baker Hughes Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Baker Hughes, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Baker Hughes should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Baker Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Baker Hughes' stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-01-21 | 2024-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.7 | 0.07 | 11 | ||
2024-10-22 | 2024-09-30 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.06 | 9 | ||
2024-07-25 | 2024-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 16 | ||
2024-04-23 | 2024-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2024-01-23 | 2023-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2023-10-25 | 2023-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2023-07-19 | 2023-06-30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 18 | ||
2023-04-19 | 2023-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2023-01-23 | 2022-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.38 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2022-10-19 | 2022-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2022-07-20 | 2022-06-30 | 0.22 | 0.11 | -0.11 | 50 | ||
2022-04-20 | 2022-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.15 | -0.05 | 25 | ||
2022-01-20 | 2021-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.25 | -0.03 | 10 | ||
2021-10-20 | 2021-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.16 | -0.05 | 23 | ||
2021-07-21 | 2021-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.1 | -0.06 | 37 | ||
2021-04-21 | 2021-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 9 | ||
2021-01-21 | 2020-12-31 | 0.17 | -0.07 | -0.24 | 141 | ||
2020-10-21 | 2020-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2020-07-22 | 2020-06-30 | -0.01 | -0.05 | -0.04 | 400 | ||
2020-04-22 | 2020-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2020-01-22 | 2019-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.27 | -0.04 | 12 | ||
2019-10-30 | 2019-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.21 | -0.03 | 12 | ||
2019-07-31 | 2019-06-30 | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2019-04-30 | 2019-03-31 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
2019-01-31 | 2018-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-10-30 | 2018-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.19 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2018-07-20 | 2018-06-30 | 0.14 | 0.13 | -0.01 | 7 | ||
2018-04-20 | 2018-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 50 | ||
2018-01-24 | 2017-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2017-10-20 | 2017-09-30 | 0.11 | 0.05 | -0.06 | 54 | ||
2017-07-28 | 2017-06-30 | -0.12 | -0.11 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
2017-04-25 | 2017-03-31 | -0.21 | -0.24 | -0.03 | 14 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | -0.11 | -0.3 | -0.19 | 172 | ||
2016-10-25 | 2016-09-30 | -0.44 | -0.15 | 0.29 | 65 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | -0.62 | -0.9 | -0.28 | 45 | ||
2016-04-27 | 2016-03-31 | -0.34 | -0.19 | 0.15 | 44 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | -0.1 | -0.21 | -0.11 | 110 | ||
2015-10-21 | 2015-09-30 | -0.14 | -0.05 | 0.09 | 64 | ||
2015-07-21 | 2015-06-30 | -0.14 | -0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2015-04-21 | 2015-03-31 | 0.46 | -0.07 | -0.53 | 115 | ||
2015-01-20 | 2014-12-31 | 1.07 | 1.44 | 0.37 | 34 | ||
2014-10-16 | 2014-09-30 | 1.13 | 1.02 | -0.11 | 9 | ||
2014-07-17 | 2014-06-30 | 0.9 | 0.92 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2014-04-17 | 2014-03-31 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2014-01-21 | 2013-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-10-18 | 2013-09-30 | 0.78 | 0.9 | 0.12 | 15 | ||
2013-07-19 | 2013-06-30 | 0.65 | 0.61 | -0.04 | 6 | ||
2013-04-19 | 2013-03-31 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2013-01-23 | 2012-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2012-10-19 | 2012-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.73 | -0.11 | 13 | ||
2012-07-20 | 2012-06-30 | 0.77 | 1.0 | 0.23 | 29 | ||
2012-04-24 | 2012-03-31 | 0.8 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2012-01-24 | 2011-12-31 | 1.32 | 1.22 | -0.1 | 7 | ||
2011-11-01 | 2011-09-30 | 1.22 | 1.18 | -0.04 | 3 | ||
2011-07-25 | 2011-06-30 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2011-04-27 | 2011-03-31 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.09 | 11 | ||
2011-01-25 | 2010-12-31 | 0.65 | 0.84 | 0.19 | 29 | ||
2010-11-01 | 2010-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.59 | 0.12 | 25 | ||
2010-08-03 | 2010-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.36 | -0.07 | 16 | ||
2010-05-04 | 2010-03-31 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 13 | ||
2010-01-26 | 2009-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 22 | ||
2009-11-04 | 2009-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.26 | -0.09 | 25 | ||
2009-08-05 | 2009-06-30 | 0.46 | 0.41 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
2009-04-29 | 2009-03-31 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2009-01-28 | 2008-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.49 | 0.23 | 18 | ||
2008-10-22 | 2008-09-30 | 1.35 | 1.29 | -0.06 | 4 | ||
2008-07-22 | 2008-06-30 | 1.24 | 1.36 | 0.12 | 9 | ||
2008-04-22 | 2008-03-31 | 1.2 | 1.21 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2008-01-30 | 2007-12-31 | 1.28 | 1.26 | -0.02 | 1 | ||
2007-10-26 | 2007-09-30 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-07-27 | 2007-06-30 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-04-25 | 2007-03-31 | 1.1 | 1.17 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2007-02-15 | 2006-12-31 | 1.19 | 1.09 | -0.1 | 8 | ||
2006-10-30 | 2006-09-30 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2006-07-28 | 2006-06-30 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 0.09 | 9 | ||
2006-04-26 | 2006-03-31 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.14 | 17 | ||
2006-02-16 | 2005-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2005-10-28 | 2005-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.65 | -0.02 | 2 | ||
2005-07-29 | 2005-06-30 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.1 | 18 | ||
2005-04-27 | 2005-03-31 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2005-02-17 | 2004-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
2004-10-28 | 2004-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2004-07-29 | 2004-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 12 | ||
2004-04-27 | 2004-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 16 | ||
2004-02-12 | 2003-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 14 | ||
2003-10-23 | 2003-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2003-07-24 | 2003-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 20 | ||
2003-04-22 | 2003-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-02-13 | 2002-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-10-24 | 2002-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 23 | ||
2002-07-25 | 2002-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-04-23 | 2002-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2002-02-14 | 2001-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2001-10-26 | 2001-09-30 | 0.34 | 0.4 | 0.06 | 17 | ||
2001-07-26 | 2001-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 14 | ||
2001-04-25 | 2001-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2001-02-15 | 2000-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-10-30 | 2000-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 50 | ||
2000-07-31 | 2000-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 71 | ||
2000-02-17 | 1999-12-31 | -0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 200 | ||
1999-11-01 | 1999-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-08-02 | 1999-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-05-04 | 1999-03-31 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1999-02-01 | 1998-12-31 | 0.18 | 0.14 | -0.04 | 22 | ||
1998-11-02 | 1998-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1998-07-24 | 1998-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1998-04-27 | 1998-03-31 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-01-26 | 1997-12-31 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
1997-10-27 | 1997-09-30 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
1997-07-23 | 1997-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
1997-04-23 | 1997-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1997-01-22 | 1996-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
1996-11-13 | 1996-09-30 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
1996-07-24 | 1996-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
1996-04-24 | 1996-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 11 |
About Baker Hughes Earnings Estimate
The earnings estimate module is a useful tool to check what professional financial analysts are assuming about the future of Baker Hughes earnings. We show available consensus EPS estimates for the upcoming years and quarters. Investors can also examine how these consensus opinions have evolved historically. We show current Baker Hughes estimates, future projections, as well as estimates 1, 2, and three years ago. Investors can search for a specific entity to conduct investment planning and build diversified portfolios. Please note, earnings estimates provided by Macroaxis are the average expectations of expert analysts that we track. If a given stock such as Baker Hughes fails to match professional earnings estimates, it usually performs purely. Wall Street refers to that as a 'negative surprise.' If a company 'beats' future estimates, it's usually called an 'upside surprise.'
Please read more on our stock advisor page.| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Retained Earnings | -5.8 B | -5.5 B | |
| Retained Earnings Total Equity | -9.7 B | -10.2 B | |
| Earnings Yield | 0.07 | 0.08 | |
| Price Earnings Ratio | 13.77 | 14.45 | |
| Price Earnings To Growth Ratio | 0.25 | 0.24 |
Pair Trading with Baker Hughes
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Baker Hughes position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Baker Hughes will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Baker Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Baker Hughes could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Baker Hughes when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Baker Hughes - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Baker Hughes Co to buy it.
The correlation of Baker Hughes is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Baker Hughes moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Baker Hughes moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Baker Hughes can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Baker Stock Analysis
When running Baker Hughes' price analysis, check to measure Baker Hughes' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Baker Hughes is operating at the current time. Most of Baker Hughes' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Baker Hughes' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Baker Hughes' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Baker Hughes to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.