Energy Transfer Correlations
| ET-PI Stock | 11.68 0.01 0.09% |
The current 90-days correlation between Energy Transfer LP and NetEase is 0.04 (i.e., Significant diversification). The correlation of Energy Transfer is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Energy Transfer Correlation With Market
Modest diversification
The correlation between Energy Transfer LP and DJI is 0.27 (i.e., Modest diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Transfer LP and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Energy |
Moving together with Energy Stock
Moving against Energy Stock
Related Correlations Analysis
| -0.07 | -0.22 | -0.55 | 0.37 | -0.09 | 0.0 | NTES | ||
| -0.07 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.7 | 0.58 | 0.71 | NTGR | ||
| -0.22 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.45 | 0.6 | 0.81 | BC | ||
| -0.55 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.4 | IPGP | ||
| 0.37 | 0.7 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.6 | 0.74 | JBL | ||
| -0.09 | 0.58 | 0.6 | 0.29 | 0.6 | 0.81 | ELTK | ||
| 0.0 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.4 | 0.74 | 0.81 | THO | ||
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Energy Stock performing well and Energy Transfer Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Energy Transfer's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 1.64 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 2.01 | 3.75 | 12.65 | |||
| NTGR | 2.24 | (0.02) | 0.00 | (0.09) | 0.00 | 4.41 | 12.12 | |||
| BC | 1.54 | (0.29) | 0.00 | (0.29) | 0.00 | 2.70 | 9.68 | |||
| IPGP | 1.80 | (0.21) | 0.00 | (0.29) | 0.00 | 4.39 | 9.93 | |||
| JBL | 1.64 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 2.50 | 3.25 | 15.22 | |||
| ELTK | 1.82 | (0.26) | 0.00 | (0.32) | 0.00 | 2.61 | 26.94 | |||
| THO | 1.92 | (0.33) | 0.00 | (0.48) | 0.00 | 3.61 | 18.55 |
Energy Transfer Corporate Management
| James Wright | General VP | Profile | |
| Troy Sturrock | Controller VP | Profile | |
| Beth Hickey | Executive LLC | Profile | |
| Gregory Mcilwain | Executive LLC | Profile | |
| Thomas CPA | LLC GP | Profile | |
| Steve Hotte | Group Officer | Profile | |
| Patrick Flavin | Group LLC | Profile |