Restaurant Brands International Stock Technical Analysis
| QSR Stock | USD 64.52 4.22 6.14% |
As of the 30th of March, Restaurant Brands holds the Variance of 2.27, coefficient of variation of (5,638), and Risk Adjusted Performance of (0.01). Compared to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model allows you to check existing technical drivers of Restaurant Brands, as well as the relationship between them. Please check Restaurant Brands risk adjusted performance, information ratio, as well as the relationship between the Information Ratio and kurtosis to decide if Restaurant Brands is priced some-what accurately, providing market reflects its current price of 64.52 per share. Given that Restaurant Brands has information ratio of 0.0113, we recommend you to check out Restaurant Brands's recent market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Restaurant Brands Momentum Analysis
Momentum indicators are widely used technical indicators which help to measure the pace at which the price of specific equity, such as Restaurant, fluctuates. Many momentum indicators also complement each other and can be helpful when the market is rising or falling as compared to RestaurantRestaurant |
Restaurant Brands Analyst Consensus
| Target Price | Advice | # of Analysts | |
| 81.04 | Strong Buy | 32 | Odds |
Most Restaurant analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to helps potential investors understand Restaurant stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching public financial statements of Restaurant Brands, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to Restaurant conference calls.
Restaurant Brands technical stock analysis exercises models and trading practices based on price and volume transformations, such as the moving averages, relative strength index, regressions, price and return correlations, business cycles, stock market cycles, or different charting patterns.
Restaurant Brands Technical Analysis
The output start index for this execution was seven with a total number of output elements of fifty-four. The Average True Range was developed by J. Welles Wilder in 1970s. It is one of components of the Welles Wilder Directional Movement indicators. The ATR is a measure of Restaurant Brands volatility. High ATR values indicate high volatility, and low values indicate low volatility.
Restaurant Brands Trend Analysis
Use this graph to draw trend lines for Restaurant Brands International. You can use it to identify possible trend reversals for Restaurant Brands as well as other signals and approximate when it will take place. Remember, you need at least two touches of the trend line with actual Restaurant Brands price movement. To start drawing, click on the pencil icon on top-right. To remove the trend, use eraser icon.Restaurant Brands Best Fit Change Line
The following chart estimates an ordinary least squares regression model for Restaurant Brands International applied against its price change over selected period. The best fit line has a slop of 0.11 , which may imply that Restaurant Brands International will maintain its good market sentiment and make money for investors. It has 122 observation points and a regression sum of squares at 443.7, which is the sum of squared deviations for the predicted Restaurant Brands price change compared to its average price change.About Restaurant Brands Technical Analysis
The technical analysis module can be used to analyzes prices, returns, volume, basic money flow, and other market information and help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands International on a daily or weekly bases. We use both bottom-up as well as top-down valuation methodologies to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its technical analysis. In general, a bottom-up approach, as applied to this company, focuses on Restaurant Brands price pattern first instead of the macroeconomic environment surrounding Restaurant Brands. By analyzing Restaurant Brands's financials, daily price indicators, and related drivers such as dividends, momentum ratios, and various types of growth rates, we attempt to find the most accurate representation of Restaurant Brands's intrinsic value. As compared to a bottom-up approach, our top-down model examines the macroeconomic factors that affect the industry/economy before zooming in to Restaurant Brands specific price patterns or momentum indicators. Please read more on our technical analysis page.
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 (projected) | Dividend Yield | 0.0406 | 0.0495 | 0.0298 | Price To Sales Ratio | 3.47 | 2.47 | 2.35 |
Restaurant Brands March 30, 2025 Technical Indicators
Most technical analysis of Restaurant help investors determine whether a current trend will continue and, if not, when it will shift. We provide a combination of tools to recognize potential entry and exit points for Restaurant from various momentum indicators to cycle indicators. When you analyze Restaurant charts, please remember that the event formation may indicate an entry point for a short seller, and look at different other indicators across different periods to confirm that a breakdown or reversion is likely to occur.
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.01) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.04) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.08 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (5,638) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 1.51 | |||
| Variance | 2.27 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.0113 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 1.0E-4 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0578 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.05) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 6.29 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.26) | |||
| Potential Upside | 2.34 | |||
| Skewness | (0.74) | |||
| Kurtosis | 3.34 |
Restaurant Brands March 30, 2025 Daily Trend Indicators
Traders often use several different daily volumes and price technical indicators to supplement a more traditional technical analysis when analyzing securities such as Restaurant stock. With literally thousands of different options, investors must choose the best indicators for them and familiarize themselves with how they work. We suggest combining traditional momentum indicators with more near-term forms of technical analysis such as Accumulation Distribution or Daily Balance Of Power. With their quantitative nature, daily value technical indicators can also be incorporated into your automated trading systems.
| Accumulation Distribution | 0.05 | ||
| Daily Balance Of Power | (1.21) | ||
| Rate Of Daily Change | 0.94 | ||
| Day Median Price | 66.16 | ||
| Day Typical Price | 65.62 | ||
| Price Action Indicator | (3.76) | ||
| Market Facilitation Index | 3.49 |
Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.