Fat Brands Stock Performance
| FATBW Stock | USD 3.12 0.00 0.00% |
FAT Brands has a performance score of 1 on a scale of 0 to 100. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.1, which means not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, FAT Brands' returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding FAT Brands is expected to be smaller as well. FAT Brands now shows a risk of 4.05%. Please confirm FAT Brands value at risk, as well as the relationship between the skewness and relative strength index , to decide if FAT Brands will be following its price patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Weak
Weak | Strong |
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FAT Brands are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly stable fundamental drivers, FAT Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors. ...more
Actual Historical Performance (%)
Year To Date Return 11.49 | Ten Year Return 366.86 | All Time Return 366.86 |
| Begin Period Cash Flow | 91.9 M |
FAT |
FAT Brands Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape
If you would invest 310.00 in FAT Brands on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2.00 from holding FAT Brands or generate 0.65% return on investment over 90 days. FAT Brands is currently producing 0.0973% returns and takes up 4.0541% volatility of returns over 90 trading days. Put another way, 36% of traded stocks are less volatile than FAT, and 99% of all traded equity instruments are likely to generate higher returns over the next 90 trading days. Expected Return |
| Risk |
FAT Brands Market Risk Analysis
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for FAT Brands' investment risk. Standard deviation is the most common way to measure market volatility of stocks, such as FAT Brands, and traders can use it to determine the average amount a FAT Brands' price has deviated from the expected return over a period of time. It is calculated by determining the expected price for the established period and then subtracting this figure from each price point. The differences are then squared, summed, and averaged to produce the variance.
Sharpe Ratio = 0.024
| Best Portfolio | Best Equity | |||
| Good Returns | ||||
| Average Returns | ||||
| Small Returns | ||||
| Cash | Small Risk | Average Risk | FATBW | Huge Risk |
| Negative Returns |
Estimated Market Risk
| 4.05 actual daily | 36 64% of assets are more volatile |
Expected Return
| 0.1 actual daily | 1 99% of assets have higher returns |
Risk-Adjusted Return
| 0.02 actual daily | 1 99% of assets perform better |
Based on monthly moving average FAT Brands is performing at about 1% of its full potential. If added to a well diversified portfolio the total return can be enhanced and market risk can be reduced. You can increase risk-adjusted return of FAT Brands by adding it to a well-diversified portfolio.
FAT Brands Fundamentals Growth
FAT Stock prices reflect investors' perceptions of the future prospects and financial health of FAT Brands, and FAT Brands fundamentals are critical determinants of its market performance. Overall, investors pay close attention to revenue and earnings growth, profit margins, and debt levels. These fundamentals can have a significant impact on FAT Stock performance.
| Return On Asset | -0.0104 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.32) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.06) % | ||||
| Revenue | 592.65 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 150.42 M | ||||
| EBITDA | (12.82 M) | ||||
| Net Income | (189.85 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 4.63 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.39 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 265.6 B | ||||
| Current Ratio | 0.68 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | (28.78) X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (56.2 M) | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 159.35 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.29 T | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (458.62 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (210.28 M) | ||||
About FAT Brands Performance
Evaluating FAT Brands' performance through its fundamental ratios, provides valuable insights into its operational efficiency and profitability. For instance, if FAT Brands has a high ROA and ROE, it suggests that the company is efficiently using its assets and equity to generate substantial profits, making it an attractive investment. Conversely, if FAT Brands has a low ROA and ROE, it may indicate underlying issues in asset and equity management, signaling a need for operational improvements. Please also refer to our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Days Of Inventory On Hand | 13.81 | 13.12 | |
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.22) | (0.21) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Return On Assets | (0.07) | (0.07) | |
| Return On Equity | 0.32 | 0.24 |
Things to note about FAT Brands performance evaluation
Checking the ongoing alerts about FAT Brands for important developments is a great way to find new opportunities for your next move. Stock alerts and notifications screener for FAT Brands help investors to be notified of important events, changes in technical or fundamental conditions, and significant headlines that can affect investment decisions.| FAT Brands is not yet fully synchronised with the market data | |
| FAT Brands had very high historical volatility over the last 90 days | |
| FAT Brands has accumulated 265.6 B in total debt. FAT Brands has a current ratio of 0.67, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Note, when we think about FAT Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with its cash and equity. | |
| The entity reported the revenue of 592.65 B. Net Loss for the year was (189.85 M) with profit before overhead, payroll, taxes, and interest of 150.42 M. | |
| FAT Brands has accumulated about 4.63 M in cash with (56.2 M) of positive cash flow from operations. This results in cash-per-share (CPS) ratio of 0.39. | |
| FAT Brands has a poor financial position based on the latest SEC disclosures |
- Analyzing FAT Brands' financial statements, including its income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement, helps in understanding its overall financial health and growth potential.
- Getting a closer look at valuation ratios like price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, and price-to-book (P/B) ratio help in understanding whether FAT Brands' stock is overvalued or undervalued compared to its peers.
- Examining FAT Brands' industry or sector and how it is performing can give you an idea of its growth potential and how it is positioned relative to its competitors.
- Evaluating FAT Brands' management team can have a significant impact on its success or failure. Reviewing the track record and experience of FAT Brands' management team can help you assess the Company's leadership.
- Pay attention to analyst opinions and ratings of FAT Brands' stock. These opinions can provide insight into FAT Brands' potential for growth and whether the stock is currently undervalued or overvalued.
Additional Tools for FAT Stock Analysis
When running FAT Brands' price analysis, check to measure FAT Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FAT Brands is operating at the current time. Most of FAT Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FAT Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FAT Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FAT Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.