Marcus Net Worth
Marcus Net Worth Breakdown | MCS |
Marcus Net Worth Analysis
Marcus' net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Marcus' financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Marcus' overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Marcus' net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Marcus' market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Marcus' stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Marcus' net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Marcus' future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Marcus' cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Marcus' net worth. This involves comparing Marcus' financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Marcus' net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if Marcus is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Marcus' net worth research are outlined below:
| Marcus generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| Marcus has 379.06 M in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 1.11, which is OK given its current industry classification. Marcus has a current ratio of 0.51, suggesting that it has not enough short term capital to pay financial commitments when the payables are due. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Marcus to invest in growth at high rates of return. | |
| Over 80.0% of Marcus shares are owned by institutional investors | |
| Latest headline from retaildive.com: Neiman Marcus Dallas flagship will close despite citys intervention |
Marcus Quarterly Good Will |
|
Marcus uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Marcus. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Marcus' previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
| 7th of March 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
| 2nd of May 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
| 7th of March 2024 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
| 30th of September 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2022 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Marcus Target Price Consensus
Marcus target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Marcus' target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
| 4 | Strong Buy |
Most Marcus analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Marcus stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Marcus, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationMarcus Target Price Projection
Marcus' current and average target prices are 18.75 and 26.00, respectively. The current price of Marcus is the price at which Marcus is currently trading. On the other hand, Marcus' target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Marcus Target Price
Know Marcus' Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Marcus is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Marcus backward and forwards among themselves. Marcus' institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Marcus' securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
| Shares | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2024-12-31 | 423.3 K | Barclays Plc | 2024-12-31 | 381.2 K | Millennium Management Llc | 2024-12-31 | 353.5 K | Arrowstreet Capital Limited Partnership | 2024-09-30 | 352.7 K | Jpmorgan Chase & Co | 2024-09-30 | 304.3 K | Aqr Capital Management Llc | 2024-12-31 | 303 K | Bank Of Montreal | 2024-12-31 | 259.7 K | Bmo Capital Markets Corp. | 2024-12-31 | 259.7 K | Renaissance Technologies Corp | 2024-12-31 | 257.1 K | Blackrock Inc | 2024-12-31 | 2.6 M | Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. | 2024-12-31 | 1.5 M |
Follow Marcus' market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Small-Cap' category with a total capitalization of 657.03 M.Market Cap |
|
Project Marcus' profitablity
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.11) | (0.12) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.17) | (0.16) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.10) | (0.11) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.29) | (0.27) |
When accessing Marcus' net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Marcus' profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Marcus' profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Marcus' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Marcus. Check Marcus' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Marcus' management manipulating its earnings.
Evaluate Marcus' management efficiency
Marcus has Return on Asset of 0.0106 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0106 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (0.0218) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. Marcus' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Marcus manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.12 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to -0.16 in 2025. At this time, Marcus' Non Currrent Assets Other are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Other Current Assets is likely to gain to about 32.9 M in 2025, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 680.1 M in 2025.| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Book Value Per Share | 14.46 | 8.56 | |
| Tangible Book Value Per Share | 12.07 | 7.91 | |
| Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | (8.40) | (7.98) | |
| Price Book Value Ratio | 0.96 | 1.54 | |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | (8.40) | (7.98) | |
| Price Fair Value | 0.96 | 1.54 | |
| Enterprise Value | 671.5 M | 629.9 M |
Marcus showcases strong leadership that adapts to market changes and drives innovation. Our analysis explores how this adaptability affects the stock's investment appeal.
Enterprise Value Revenue 1.4066 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.118 | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Marcus insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Marcus' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Marcus insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Katherine Gehl over six months ago Acquisition by Katherine Gehl of 1455 shares of Marcus at 14.69 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Chad Paris over six months ago Acquisition by Chad Paris of 19500 shares of Marcus subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Stephen Marcus over six months ago Disposition of 11015 shares by Stephen Marcus of Marcus subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Diane Gershowitz over six months ago Disposition of 33328 shares by Diane Gershowitz of Marcus subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Gregory Marcus over a year ago Disposition of 7898 shares by Gregory Marcus of Marcus at 14.69 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Marcus Corporate Filings
| 14th of February 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
F4 | 31st of December 2024 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
13A | 3rd of December 2024 An amended filing to the original Schedule 13G | ViewVerify |
| 14th of November 2024 Other Reports | ViewVerify |
Marcus Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Marcus' earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Marcus is estimated to be 0.0 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.0 to a high of 0.0. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Marcus is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.00 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.00 Highest |
Marcus Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Marcus' value are higher than the current market price of the Marcus stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Marcus is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Marcus' stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of December 2024 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 3 | 60.02% | 0.73 | 0.0 | -0.32 |
Marcus Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Marcus refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Marcus predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Marcus, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Marcus Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Marcus, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Marcus should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Marcus Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Marcus' stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-10-31 | 2024-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 58 | ||
2024-08-01 | 2024-06-30 | 0.03 | -0.64 | -0.67 | 2233 | ||
2024-05-02 | 2024-03-31 | -0.37 | -0.38 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2024-02-29 | 2023-12-31 | -0.17 | -0.05 | 0.12 | 70 | ||
2023-11-01 | 2023-09-30 | 0.34 | 0.31 | -0.03 | 8 | ||
2023-08-02 | 2023-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 20 | ||
2023-05-04 | 2023-03-31 | -0.19 | -0.31 | -0.12 | 63 | ||
2023-03-02 | 2022-12-31 | -0.17 | -0.3 | -0.13 | 76 | ||
2022-11-03 | 2022-09-30 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 42 | ||
2022-08-03 | 2022-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 200 | ||
2022-05-05 | 2022-03-31 | -0.36 | -0.48 | -0.12 | 33 | ||
2022-03-03 | 2021-12-31 | -0.18 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 200 | ||
2021-11-03 | 2021-09-30 | -0.42 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 114 | ||
2021-08-04 | 2021-06-30 | -0.83 | -0.67 | 0.16 | 19 | ||
2021-05-05 | 2021-03-31 | -1.2 | -0.96 | 0.24 | 20 | ||
2021-03-04 | 2020-12-31 | -1.17 | -1.49 | -0.32 | 27 | ||
2020-11-03 | 2020-09-30 | -1.25 | -1.27 | -0.02 | 1 | ||
2020-08-04 | 2020-06-30 | -1.61 | -1.47 | 0.14 | 8 | ||
2020-05-05 | 2020-03-31 | -0.4 | -0.29 | 0.11 | 27 | ||
2020-02-20 | 2019-12-31 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.08 | 36 | ||
2019-10-24 | 2019-09-30 | 0.55 | 0.46 | -0.09 | 16 | ||
2019-07-25 | 2019-06-30 | 0.61 | 0.58 | -0.03 | 4 | ||
2019-04-25 | 2019-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 116 | ||
2019-02-21 | 2018-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 17 | ||
2018-10-25 | 2018-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 19 | ||
2018-07-26 | 2018-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.13 | 25 | ||
2018-04-26 | 2018-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2018-02-22 | 2017-12-31 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 21 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2017-07-27 | 2017-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.36 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.3 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2017-02-23 | 2016-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 24 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.09 | 21 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 17 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 100 | ||
2016-02-24 | 2015-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.1 | 58 | ||
2015-12-17 | 2015-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.18 | -0.02 | 10 | ||
2015-07-23 | 2015-06-30 | 0.17 | 0.12 | -0.05 | 29 | ||
2015-03-19 | 2014-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 140 | ||
2014-12-18 | 2014-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 35 | ||
2014-09-18 | 2014-06-30 | 0.5 | 0.45 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
2014-03-20 | 2013-12-31 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 1400 | ||
2013-12-19 | 2013-09-30 | 0.16 | 0.12 | -0.04 | 25 | ||
2013-09-19 | 2013-06-30 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2012-12-20 | 2012-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 13 | ||
2012-09-20 | 2012-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.37 | -0.12 | 24 | ||
2011-12-15 | 2011-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
2011-09-15 | 2011-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2011-03-16 | 2010-12-31 | 0.05 | -0.03 | -0.08 | 160 | ||
2010-12-16 | 2010-09-30 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-09-16 | 2010-06-30 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-03-18 | 2009-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 120 | ||
2009-12-17 | 2009-09-30 | 0.07 | -0.01 | -0.08 | 114 | ||
2009-09-17 | 2009-06-30 | 0.38 | 0.34 | -0.04 | 10 | ||
2009-03-19 | 2008-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 | ||
2008-12-18 | 2008-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 70 | ||
2008-09-18 | 2008-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.42 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
2008-03-19 | 2007-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 | ||
2007-12-20 | 2007-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.1 | -0.08 | 44 | ||
2007-09-25 | 2007-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.38 | -0.07 | 15 | ||
2007-03-19 | 2006-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.14 | -0.06 | 30 | ||
2006-12-19 | 2006-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 73 | ||
2006-09-19 | 2006-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-03-21 | 2005-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
2005-12-15 | 2005-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-09-19 | 2005-06-30 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2005-03-22 | 2004-12-31 | 0.16 | 0.06 | -0.1 | 62 | ||
2004-12-16 | 2004-09-30 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 27 | ||
2004-09-21 | 2004-06-30 | 0.48 | 0.35 | -0.13 | 27 | ||
2004-03-18 | 2003-12-31 | 0.11 | 0.08 | -0.03 | 27 | ||
2003-12-18 | 2003-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 60 | ||
2003-09-18 | 2003-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2003-03-20 | 2002-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.06 | -0.04 | 40 | ||
2002-12-19 | 2002-09-30 | 0.11 | 0.09 | -0.02 | 18 | ||
2002-09-19 | 2002-06-30 | 0.44 | 0.42 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2002-03-21 | 2001-12-31 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 25 | ||
2001-12-20 | 2001-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 133 | ||
2001-09-26 | 2001-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.14 | 38 | ||
2001-03-22 | 2000-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.04 | 80 | ||
2000-12-20 | 2000-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.13 | -0.04 | 23 | ||
2000-09-21 | 2000-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.38 | -0.04 | 9 | ||
2000-03-21 | 1999-12-31 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-12-22 | 1999-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-09-23 | 1999-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.44 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
1999-03-25 | 1998-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 60 | ||
1998-12-28 | 1998-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.2 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
1998-07-23 | 1998-06-30 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-06-22 | 1998-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-12-12 | 1997-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 45 | ||
1997-09-18 | 1997-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
1997-03-06 | 1996-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 30 | ||
1996-12-12 | 1996-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.23 | -0.02 | 8 | ||
1996-07-25 | 1996-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-02-28 | 1995-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
1995-12-06 | 1995-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 |
Marcus Corporate Directors
| Philip Milstein | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Timothy Hoeksema | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Steven Bartelt | Director Secretary | Profile | |
| Diane Gershowitz | Director | Profile |
Additional Tools for Marcus Stock Analysis
When running Marcus' price analysis, check to measure Marcus' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Marcus is operating at the current time. Most of Marcus' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Marcus' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Marcus' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Marcus to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.