Great Lakes Net Worth
Great Lakes Net Worth Breakdown | GLDD |
Great Lakes Net Worth Analysis
Great Lakes' net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Great Lakes' financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Great Lakes' overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Great Lakes' net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Great Lakes' market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Great Lakes' stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Great Lakes' net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Great Lakes' future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Great Lakes' cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Great Lakes' net worth. This involves comparing Great Lakes' financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Great Lakes' net worth relative to its peers.
Enterprise Value |
|
To determine if Great Lakes is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Great Lakes' net worth research are outlined below:
| Great Lakes Dredge generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| Great Lakes Dredge has high historical volatility and very poor performance | |
| Over 86.0% of the company shares are owned by institutional investors | |
| Latest headline from simplywall.st: Disposition of 891 shares by Ryan Bayer of Great Lakes at 8.7 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Great Lakes uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Great Lakes Dredge. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Great Lakes' previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
| 21st of February 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
| 7th of May 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2023 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
| 21st of February 2024 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
| 30th of September 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
| 31st of December 2022 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Great Lakes Target Price Consensus
Great target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Great Lakes' target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
| 2 | Strong Buy |
Most Great analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Great stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Great Lakes Dredge, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationGreat Lakes Target Price Projection
Great Lakes' current and average target prices are 9.33 and 14.67, respectively. The current price of Great Lakes is the price at which Great Lakes Dredge is currently trading. On the other hand, Great Lakes' target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Great Lakes Target Price
Know Great Lakes' Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Great Lakes is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Great Lakes Dredge backward and forwards among themselves. Great Lakes' institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Great Lakes' securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
| Shares | Private Management Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 1.2 M | Jpmorgan Chase & Co | 2024-12-31 | 820.4 K | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2024-12-31 | 812.3 K | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 2024-12-31 | 699.1 K | Millennium Management Llc | 2024-12-31 | 698.1 K | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2024-12-31 | 692 K | Next Century Growth Investors Llc | 2024-12-31 | 667.5 K | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-12-31 | 664.1 K | London Company Of Virginia | 2024-12-31 | 642.7 K | Blackrock Inc | 2024-12-31 | 7.1 M | Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. | 2024-12-31 | 4.4 M |
Follow Great Lakes' market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Small-Cap' category with a current market capitalization of 621.69 M.Market Cap |
|
Project Great Lakes' profitablity
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.09 | 0.06 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 |
When accessing Great Lakes' net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Great Lakes' profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Great Lakes' profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Please note, the presentation of Great Lakes' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Great Lakes' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Great Lakes' management manipulating its earnings.
Evaluate Great Lakes' management efficiency
Great Lakes Dredge has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0475 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0475 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1373 %, meaning that it created $0.1373 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Great Lakes' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Great Lakes manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, Great Lakes' Return On Assets are projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Return On Equity is expected to grow to 0.13, whereas Return On Capital Employed is forecasted to decline to 0.06. At present, Great Lakes' Return On Tangible Assets are projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Intangibles To Total Assets is expected to grow to 0.12, whereas Other Assets are forecasted to decline to 1.09.| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Book Value Per Share | 6.69 | 3.90 | |
| Tangible Book Value Per Share | 5.55 | 5.83 | |
| Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 13.93 | 14.63 | |
| Price Book Value Ratio | 1.69 | 1.60 | |
| Enterprise Value Multiple | 13.93 | 14.63 | |
| Price Fair Value | 1.69 | 1.60 | |
| Enterprise Value | 891.8 M | 742.2 M |
Management at Great Lakes Dredge focuses on leveraging technology and optimizing operations. We evaluate the impact of these focuses on the company's financial health and stock performance.
Enterprise Value Revenue 1.4908 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.116 | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Great Lakes insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Great Lakes' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Great Lakes insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Great Lakes Corporate Filings
F4 | 18th of March 2025 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
| 17th of March 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
8K | 14th of March 2025 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
8K | 3rd of March 2025 An amendment to a previously filed Form 8-K | ViewVerify |
Great Lakes Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Great Lakes' earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Great Lakes is estimated to be 0.2625 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.25 to a high of 0.3. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Great Lakes Dredge is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.25 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.30 Highest |
Great Lakes Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Great Lakes' value are higher than the current market price of the Great Lakes stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Great Lakes is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Great Lakes' stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 3 | 40.13% | 0.29 | 0.2625 | 0.87 |
Great Lakes Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Great Lakes refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Great Lakes Dredge predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Great Lakes, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Great Lakes Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Great Lakes, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Great Lakes should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Great Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Great Lakes' stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-02-12 | 2024-12-31 | 0.2267 | 0.29 | 0.0633 | 27 | ||
2024-11-05 | 2024-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.13 | -0.05 | 27 | ||
2024-08-06 | 2024-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 450 | ||
2024-05-07 | 2024-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 287 | ||
2024-02-14 | 2023-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 220 | ||
2023-11-07 | 2023-09-30 | -0.12 | -0.09 | 0.03 | 25 | ||
2023-08-01 | 2023-06-30 | -0.1 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 130 | ||
2023-05-02 | 2023-03-31 | -0.17 | -0.05 | 0.12 | 70 | ||
2023-02-15 | 2022-12-31 | -0.14 | -0.47 | -0.33 | 235 | ||
2022-11-01 | 2022-09-30 | 0.03 | -0.15 | -0.18 | 600 | ||
2022-08-02 | 2022-06-30 | 0.17 | -0.06 | -0.23 | 135 | ||
2022-05-03 | 2022-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2022-02-16 | 2021-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 19 | ||
2021-11-02 | 2021-09-30 | 0.26 | 0.21 | -0.05 | 19 | ||
2021-08-03 | 2021-06-30 | 0.17 | 0.03 | -0.14 | 82 | ||
2021-05-04 | 2021-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.13 | -0.09 | 40 | ||
2021-02-17 | 2020-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.16 | -0.04 | 20 | ||
2020-11-04 | 2020-09-30 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2020-08-04 | 2020-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 40 | ||
2020-05-05 | 2020-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 0.29 | 126 | ||
2020-02-19 | 2019-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 21 | ||
2019-11-05 | 2019-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 16 | ||
2019-07-31 | 2019-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
2019-04-30 | 2019-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.27 | 0.2 | 285 | ||
2019-02-20 | 2018-12-31 | -0.01 | -0.12 | -0.11 | 1100 | ||
2018-11-06 | 2018-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 200 | ||
2018-08-01 | 2018-06-30 | 0.02 | -0.01 | -0.03 | 150 | ||
2018-05-02 | 2018-03-31 | -0.14 | -0.1 | 0.04 | 28 | ||
2018-02-20 | 2017-12-31 | -0.09 | -0.13 | -0.04 | 44 | ||
2017-11-07 | 2017-09-30 | -0.01 | -0.08 | -0.07 | 700 | ||
2017-08-02 | 2017-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.01 | 33 | ||
2017-05-03 | 2017-03-31 | -0.04 | -0.06 | -0.02 | 50 | ||
2017-02-22 | 2016-12-31 | -0.05 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 120 | ||
2016-11-02 | 2016-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 166 | ||
2016-08-04 | 2016-06-30 | -0.0025 | -0.03 | -0.0275 | 1100 | ||
2016-05-03 | 2016-03-31 | -0.06 | -0.07 | -0.01 | 16 | ||
2016-02-23 | 2015-12-31 | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.05 | 125 | ||
2015-11-03 | 2015-09-30 | 0.02 | 0.0051 | -0.0149 | 74 | ||
2015-08-04 | 2015-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.05 | -0.02 | 28 | ||
2015-05-05 | 2015-03-31 | -0.03 | -0.14 | -0.11 | 366 | ||
2015-02-24 | 2014-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
2014-11-05 | 2014-09-30 | 0.1 | -0.01 | -0.11 | 110 | ||
2014-08-05 | 2014-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.04 | -0.03 | 42 | ||
2014-05-06 | 2014-03-31 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.03 | 300 | ||
2014-02-25 | 2013-12-31 | 0.06 | -0.18 | -0.24 | 400 | ||
2013-11-05 | 2013-09-30 | 0.05 | -0.01 | -0.06 | 120 | ||
2013-08-08 | 2013-06-30 | 0.08 | -0.29 | -0.37 | 462 | ||
2013-05-07 | 2013-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.03 | 75 | ||
2013-03-14 | 2012-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.01 | -0.18 | 94 | ||
2012-11-06 | 2012-09-30 | 0.13 | -0.04 | -0.17 | 130 | ||
2012-08-07 | 2012-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.07 | -0.03 | 30 | ||
2012-05-01 | 2012-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 80 | ||
2012-02-21 | 2011-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 20 | ||
2011-11-01 | 2011-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
2011-08-02 | 2011-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.03 | -0.13 | 81 | ||
2011-05-03 | 2011-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.04 | -0.11 | 73 | ||
2011-02-22 | 2010-12-31 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 37 | ||
2010-11-04 | 2010-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 160 | ||
2010-08-03 | 2010-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 100 | ||
2010-05-04 | 2010-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 60 | ||
2010-02-23 | 2009-12-31 | 0.08 | 0.02 | -0.06 | 75 | ||
2009-11-03 | 2009-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.03 | -0.02 | 40 | ||
2009-08-04 | 2009-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 85 | ||
2009-05-07 | 2009-03-31 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 550 | ||
2009-02-26 | 2008-12-31 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 25 | ||
2008-11-04 | 2008-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 60 | ||
2008-08-07 | 2008-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 150 | ||
2008-05-06 | 2008-03-31 | 0.02 | -0.02 | -0.04 | 200 | ||
2008-02-26 | 2007-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-11-06 | 2007-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.03 | 75 | ||
2007-08-08 | 2007-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.03 | -0.03 | 50 | ||
2007-05-09 | 2007-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 50 | ||
2007-02-16 | 2006-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.03 | -0.03 | 50 |
Great Lakes Corporate Management
| Trond Ellefsen | VP Innovation | Profile | |
| James Tastard | Sr Officer | Profile | |
| Lynn Nietfeld | Senior Region | Profile | |
| David Johanson | Senior Operations | Profile | |
| Todd Lightfoot | VP Officer | Profile | |
| Steven Becker | Senior Engineering | Profile |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Great Lakes Dredge. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in unemployment. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.
Is Construction & Engineering space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Great Lakes. If investors know Great will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Great Lakes listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.10) | Earnings Share 0.87 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.116 | Return On Assets |
The market value of Great Lakes Dredge is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Great that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Great Lakes' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Great Lakes' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Great Lakes' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Great Lakes' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Great Lakes' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Great Lakes is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Great Lakes' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.