Restaurant Historical Cash Flow
| QSR Stock | USD 69.80 0.20 0.29% |
Analysis of Restaurant Brands cash flow over time is an excellent tool to project Restaurant Brands future capital expenditures as well as to predict the amount of cash needed to cover cost of sales, R&D expenses or production expansions. Investors should almost always look for trends in cash flow indicators such as End Period Cash Flow of 1.2 B or Stock Based Compensation of 203.7 M as it is a great indicator of Restaurant Brands ability to facilitate future growth, repay debt on time or pay out dividends.
Financial Statement Analysis is much more than just reviewing and examining Restaurant Brands latest accounting reports to predict its past. Macroaxis encourages investors to analyze financial statements over time for various trends across multiple indicators and accounts to determine whether Restaurant Brands is a good buy for the upcoming year.
Restaurant |
About Restaurant Cash Flow Analysis
The Cash Flow Statement is a financial statement that shows how changes in Restaurant balance sheet and income statement accounts affect cash and cash equivalents. It breaks the analysis down to operating, investing, and financing activities. One of the most critical aspects of the cash flow statement is liquidity, which is the degree to which Restaurant's non-liquid assets can be easily converted into cash.
Restaurant Brands Cash Flow Chart
Add Fundamental
Capital Expenditures
Capital Expenditures are funds used by Restaurant Brands to acquire physical assets such as property, industrial buildings or equipment. This type of outlay is used by management to increase the scope of Restaurant Brands operations. These expenditures can include everything from repairing an office equipment, building a brand new facility, or writing new software.Free Cash Flow
The amount of cash a company generates after accounting for cash outflows to support operations and maintain its capital assets.Most accounts from Restaurant Brands' cash flow statement are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing cash flow statement accounts one by one will only give a small insight into Restaurant Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of cash flow statement accounts, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. At this time, Restaurant Brands' Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes is relatively stable compared to the past year.
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Free Cash Flow | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.2B | 1.1B | Stock Based Compensation | 102M | 136M | 194M | 203.7M |
Restaurant Brands cash flow statement Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Restaurant Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Restaurant Brands cash flow statement Accounts
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Capital Expenditures | 62M | 117M | 106M | 100M | 120M | 74.5M | |
| Total Cash From Operating Activities | 1.5B | 921M | 1.7B | 1.5B | 1.3B | 805.4M | |
| Net Income | 1.1B | 750M | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
| Total Cash From Financing Activities | (842M) | (821M) | (1.1B) | (1.3B) | (1.4B) | (1.3B) | |
| Other Cashflows From Investing Activities | 8M | 5M | (9M) | (35M) | (31.5M) | (33.1M) | |
| Change To Liabilities | 112M | (183M) | 149M | 169M | 194.4M | 204.1M | |
| Dividends Paid | 901M | 959M | 974M | 971M | (990M) | (940.5M) | |
| Change To Account Receivables | (53M) | (30K) | 8M | (110M) | (149.7M) | (142.2M) | |
| End Period Cash Flow | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.2B | |
| Change To Inventory | (15M) | (10M) | 12M | (61M) | (43M) | (40.9M) | |
| Change In Cash | 620M | 27M | (473M) | 91M | (39M) | (37.1M) | |
| Stock Based Compensation | 68M | 74M | 102M | 136M | 194M | 203.7M | |
| Free Cash Flow | 1.4B | 804M | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.2B | 1.1B | |
| Change In Working Capital | 131M | (184M) | 158M | (310M) | (291M) | (276.5M) | |
| Begin Period Cash Flow | 913M | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.2B | |
| Total Cashflows From Investing Activities | (30M) | (79M) | (1.1B) | (64M) | (73.6M) | (77.3M) | |
| Other Cashflows From Financing Activities | 2.3B | 4.8B | (74M) | 54M | 153M | 145.4M | |
| Depreciation | 185M | 189M | 201M | 190M | 191M | 176M | |
| Other Non Cash Items | (77M) | 300M | 17M | 52M | 447.2M | 469.5M | |
| Sale Purchase Of Stock | 102M | (298M) | (551M) | (326M) | (500M) | (475M) | |
| Net Borrowings | (66M) | 438M | 446M | (92M) | (82.8M) | (78.7M) | |
| Change To Operating Activities | 33M | 17M | (31M) | (334M) | (300.6M) | (285.6M) | |
| Change To Netincome | 58M | 65M | 522M | 126M | 144.9M | 84.6M | |
| Change Receivables | (53M) | (30M) | 8M | (110M) | (99M) | (94.1M) | |
| Exchange Rate Changes | 24M | (20M) | 16M | 6M | 6.9M | 7.2M | |
| Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes | 620M | 27M | (470M) | 119M | 107.1M | 112.5M | |
| Cash Flows Other Operating | 49M | 114M | (8M) | (395M) | (355.5M) | (337.7M) |
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Restaurant Stock
| 0.47 | XPOF | Xponential Fitness | PairCorr |
| 0.45 | LIND | Lindblad Expeditions | PairCorr |
| 0.33 | FWRG | First Watch Restaurant | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.