Fortune Selling General Administrative vs Net Income From Continuing Ops Analysis
FBIN Stock | 77.97 0.03 0.04% |
Fortune Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining Fortune Brands Innov latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Fortune Brands Innov is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Fortune Brands Selling General Administrative and its Net Income From Continuing Ops accounts. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Fortune Brands Innovations. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
Selling General Administrative vs Net Income From Continuing Ops
Selling General Administrative vs Net Income From Continuing Ops Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Fortune Brands Innov Selling General Administrative account and Net Income From Continuing Ops. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have weak relationship.
The correlation between Fortune Brands' Selling General Administrative and Net Income From Continuing Ops is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Selling General Administrative that can explain the historical movement of Net Income From Continuing Ops in the same time period over historical financial statements of Fortune Brands Innovations, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Fortune Brands' Selling General Administrative and Net Income From Continuing Ops is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Selling General Administrative of Fortune Brands Innovations are associated (or correlated) with its Net Income From Continuing Ops. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Net Income From Continuing Ops has no effect on the direction of Selling General Administrative i.e., Fortune Brands' Selling General Administrative and Net Income From Continuing Ops go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.32 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Very Weak |
Selling General Administrative
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Most indicators from Fortune Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Fortune Brands Innov current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Fortune Brands Innovations. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. At this time, Fortune Brands' Tax Provision is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 28th of November 2024, Discontinued Operations is likely to grow to about 141.3 M, while Selling General Administrative is likely to drop about 992 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 84.4M | 119.2M | 116.5M | 70.2M | Depreciation And Amortization | 171.4M | 174.8M | 168.8M | 150.9M |
Fortune Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Fortune Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Fortune Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 6.3B | 7.4B | 7.9B | 6.1B | 6.6B | 5.9B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 2.2B | 2.6B | 2.7B | 2.7B | 2.8B | 1.6B | |
Other Current Liab | 549.6M | 653.8M | 920M | 499.1M | 563.7M | 512.7M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 1.4B | 1.3B | 2.0B | 1.5B | 1.2B | 1.1B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 2.4B | 2.8B | 3.1B | 2.1B | 2.3B | 2.3B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 824.2M | 917.4M | 1.0B | 783.7M | 1.1B | 790.3M | |
Net Debt | 1.8B | 2.2B | 2.2B | 2.0B | 2.4B | 1.2B | |
Retained Earnings | 1.8B | 2.2B | 2.8B | 2.3B | 2.6B | 2.7B | |
Accounts Payable | 460M | 620.5M | 561M | 421.6M | 568.1M | 437.8M | |
Cash | 387.9M | 419.1M | 471.5M | 642.5M | 366.4M | 320.6M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 4.4B | 5.2B | 5.2B | 3.7B | 4.5B | 4.0B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 257.2M | 378.5M | 299.2M | 91.2M | (1.2B) | (1.1B) | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 387.9M | 419.1M | 471.5M | 642.5M | 366.4M | 320.6M | |
Net Receivables | 624.8M | 734.9M | 580.4M | 521.8M | 534.2M | 555.0M | |
Good Will | 2.1B | 2.4B | 2.5B | 1.6B | 1.9B | 1.9B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 141.3M | 140.2M | 139.5M | 131.3M | 127.7M | 121.2M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 6.3B | 7.4B | 7.9B | 6.1B | 6.6B | 5.9B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 2.5B | 3.2B | 2.9B | 2.5B | 3.1B | 2.4B | |
Inventory | 718.6M | 867.2M | 1.2B | 1.0B | 982.3M | 688.4M | |
Other Current Assets | 166.9M | 187.3M | 847.7M | 274.8M | 162.8M | 219.5M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 734.4M | 648.6M | 279.6M | (276.2M) | (377.1M) | (358.2M) | |
Total Liab | 3.9B | 4.6B | 4.9B | 4.0B | 4.3B | 3.6B | |
Total Current Assets | 1.9B | 2.2B | 2.7B | 2.5B | 2.0B | 1.8B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (72.6M) | (55.1M) | (24.6M) | 37.4M | 63.3M | 66.5M | |
Short Term Debt | 399.7M | 38.5M | 400M | 599.2M | 37.1M | 35.2M | |
Intangible Assets | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.0B | 1.4B | 1.1B | |
Long Term Debt | 1.8B | 2.6B | 2.3B | 2.1B | 2.7B | 2.4B | |
Net Invested Capital | 4.6B | 5.3B | 5.8B | 4.8B | 5.0B | 5.5B | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 171.2M | 205.4M | 176M | 278.1M | 99.2M | 145M | |
Net Working Capital | 488.9M | 863.4M | 773.4M | 913.3M | 845.3M | 747.7M |
Pair Trading with Fortune Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Fortune Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fortune Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Fortune Stock
0.51 | VKSC | Viskase Companies | PairCorr |
0.46 | ANSLY | Ansell Ltd ADR | PairCorr |
0.44 | AIRJW | Montana Technologies Symbol Change | PairCorr |
0.41 | AIRJ | Montana Technologies Symbol Change | PairCorr |
0.31 | AWI | Armstrong World Indu | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Fortune Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Fortune Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Fortune Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Fortune Brands Innovations to buy it.
The correlation of Fortune Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Fortune Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Fortune Brands Innov moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Fortune Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Fortune Brands Innovations. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Is Building Products space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Fortune Brands. If investors know Fortune will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Fortune Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.019 | Dividend Share 0.95 | Earnings Share 3.55 | Revenue Per Share 37.269 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.08) |
The market value of Fortune Brands Innov is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Fortune that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Fortune Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Fortune Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Fortune Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Fortune Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Fortune Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Fortune Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Fortune Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.