Correlation Between Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands Innovations, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Montana Technologies with a short position of Fortune Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands

-0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Montana and Fortune is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands Innovations in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fortune Brands Innov and Montana Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Montana Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Fortune Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fortune Brands Innov has no effect on the direction of Montana Technologies i.e., Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands

Assuming the 90 days horizon Montana Technologies is expected to generate 3.68 times more return on investment than Fortune Brands. However, Montana Technologies is 3.68 times more volatile than Fortune Brands Innovations. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fortune Brands Innovations is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  50.00  in Montana Technologies on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  34.00  from holding Montana Technologies or generate 68.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy84.13%
ValuesDaily Returns

Montana Technologies  vs.  Fortune Brands Innovations

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Montana Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Montana Technologies are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking indicators, Montana Technologies showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fortune Brands Innov 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fortune Brands Innovations has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Fortune Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Montana Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Fortune Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fortune Brands will offset losses from the drop in Fortune Brands' long position.
The idea behind Montana Technologies and Fortune Brands Innovations pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation