17 Education Technology Stock Piotroski F Score

YQ Stock  USD 2.31  0.33  16.67%   
This module uses fundamental data of 17 Education to approximate its Piotroski F score. 17 Education F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of 17 Education Technology. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about 17 Education financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out 17 Education Altman Z Score, 17 Education Correlation, 17 Education Valuation, as well as analyze 17 Education Alpha and Beta and 17 Education Hype Analysis.
  
At this time, 17 Education's Net Debt To EBITDA is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 03/21/2025, Debt To Equity is likely to grow to 0.04, while Net Debt is likely to drop (349.7 M). At this time, 17 Education's Shareholders Equity Per Share is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 03/21/2025, Debt To Equity is likely to grow to 0.04, while Free Cash Flow Yield is likely to drop (0.04).
At this time, it appears that 17 Education's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
5.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Negative

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Negative

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Decrease

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Decrease

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

Increase

Focus

17 Education Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to 17 Education is to make sure 17 Education is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if 17 Education's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if 17 Education's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover0.430.22
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.650.54
Fairly Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Liabilities197.3 M207.7 M
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total8.3 M8.7 M
Notably Down
Slightly volatile
Total Assets1.3 B787.2 M
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets1.1 B567.7 M
Way Up
Pretty Stable

17 Education Technology F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between 17 Education's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards 17 Education in a much-optimized way.

About 17 Education Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Pretax Profit Margin

(1.72)

At this time, 17 Education's Pretax Profit Margin is relatively stable compared to the past year.

17 Education Current Valuation Drivers

We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of 17 Education from analyzing 17 Education's financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess 17 Education's ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of 17 Education's important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
202020212022202320242025 (projected)
Market Cap794.4B19.6B35.4B6.7B7.7B7.4B
Enterprise Value791.7B18.6B34.7B6.4B7.4B7.0B

17 Education ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, 17 Education's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to 17 Education's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About 17 Education Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze 17 Education Technology's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of 17 Education using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of 17 Education Technology based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Additional Tools for 17 Education Stock Analysis

When running 17 Education's price analysis, check to measure 17 Education's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy 17 Education is operating at the current time. Most of 17 Education's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of 17 Education's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move 17 Education's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of 17 Education to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.