| RDCM Stock | | | USD 12.15 0.33 2.79% |
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out
Radcom Piotroski F Score and
Radcom Valuation analysis.
To learn how to invest in Radcom Stock, please use our
How to Invest in Radcom guide.
Radcom Company Z Score Analysis
Radcom's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
| First Factor | = | 1.2 * ( | Working Capital | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Second Factor | = | 1.4 * ( | Retained Earnings | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Thrid Factor | = | 3.3 * ( | EBITAD | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Fouth Factor | = | 0.6 * ( | Market Value of Equity | / | Total Liabilities ) |
|
| Fifth Factor | = | 0.99 * ( | Revenue | / | Total Assets ) |
|
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Based on the company's disclosures, Radcom has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Communications Equipment sector and 100.0% lower than that of the
Information Technology industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
| | Portfolio BacktestingAvoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |
Radcom Fundamentals
About Radcom Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Radcom's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Radcom using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Radcom based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectIs Communications Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Radcom. If investors know Radcom will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Radcom listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Radcom is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Radcom that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Radcom's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Radcom's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Radcom's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Radcom's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Radcom's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Radcom is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Radcom's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.