Restaurant Brands International Stock Debt To Equity

QSR Stock  CAD 97.51  0.73  0.74%   
Restaurant Brands International fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Restaurant Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Restaurant Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Restaurant Brands stock.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Debt To Equity 4.52  3.29 
As of the 29th of November 2024, Debt To Equity is likely to drop to 3.29.
  
This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools.

Restaurant Brands International Company Debt To Equity Analysis

Restaurant Brands' Debt to Equity is calculated by dividing the Total Debt of a company by its Equity. If the debt exceeds equity of a company, then the creditors have more stakes in a firm than the stockholders. In other words, Debt to Equity ratio provides analysts with insights about composition of both equity and debt, and its influence on the valuation of the company.

D/E

 = 

Total Debt

Total Equity

More About Debt To Equity | All Equity Analysis

Current Restaurant Brands Debt To Equity

    
  3.52 %  
Most of Restaurant Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Debt To Equity, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Restaurant Brands International is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.

Restaurant Debt To Equity Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Restaurant Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Restaurant Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Debt To Equity. Since Restaurant Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Restaurant Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Restaurant Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
High Debt to Equity ratio typically indicates that a firm has been borrowing aggressively to finance its growth and as a result may experience a burden of additional interest expense. This may reduce earnings or future growth. On the other hand a small D/E ratio may indicate that a company is not taking enough advantage from financial leverage. Debt to Equity ratio measures how the company is leveraging borrowing against the capital invested by the owners.
Competition

Restaurant Total Stockholder Equity

Total Stockholder Equity

2.24 Billion

At this time, Restaurant Brands' Total Stockholder Equity is very stable compared to the past year.
According to the company disclosure, Restaurant Brands International has a Debt To Equity of 3.516%. This is 96.71% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 96.82% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The debt to equity for all Canada stocks is 92.78% higher than that of the company.

Restaurant Debt To Equity Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Restaurant Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Debt To Equity to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Restaurant Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Restaurant Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
Restaurant Brands is currently under evaluation in debt to equity category among its peers.

Restaurant Brands ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Restaurant Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Restaurant Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environment Score
Governance Score
Social Score

Restaurant Fundamentals

About Restaurant Brands Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Restaurant Brands International's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving against Restaurant Stock

  0.58SCD Scandium CanadaPairCorr
  0.31LCX Lycos EnergyPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Restaurant Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze Restaurant Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Restaurant Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Restaurant Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Restaurant Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Restaurant Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.