This module uses fundamental data of NVIDIA CDR to approximate its Piotroski F score. NVIDIA CDR F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of NVIDIA CDR. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about NVIDIA CDR financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in NVIDIA CDR. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
NVIDIA
Piotroski F Score
Change To Inventory
Investments
Change In Cash
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Total Assets
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Long Term Debt
Net Receivables
Good Will
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Short Term Investments
Non Current Liabilities Total
Capital Lease Obligations
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Long Term Investments
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Total Current Assets
Non Current Liabilities Other
Net Working Capital
Intangible Assets
Tax Provision
Net Interest Income
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Income
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Research Development
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Reconciled Depreciation
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Probability Of Bankruptcy
The current year's Long Term Debt is expected to grow to about 9.6 B, whereas Net Debt is forecasted to decline to about 2.3 B.
At this time, it appears that NVIDIA CDR's Piotroski F Score is Inapplicable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to NVIDIA CDR is to make sure NVIDIA is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if NVIDIA CDR's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if NVIDIA CDR's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between NVIDIA CDR's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards NVIDIA CDR in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Net Debt
2.31 Billion
At present, NVIDIA CDR's Net Debt is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
About NVIDIA CDR Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze NVIDIA CDR's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of NVIDIA CDR using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of NVIDIA CDR based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if NVIDIA CDR position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in NVIDIA CDR will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to NVIDIA CDR could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace NVIDIA CDR when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back NVIDIA CDR - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling NVIDIA CDR to buy it.
The correlation of NVIDIA CDR is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as NVIDIA CDR moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if NVIDIA CDR moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for NVIDIA CDR can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
NVIDIA CDR financial ratios help investors to determine whether NVIDIA Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in NVIDIA with respect to the benefits of owning NVIDIA CDR security.