| NNGD Stock | | | EUR 54.00 1.00 1.82% |
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out
Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in National Grid plc. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as
signals in unemployment.
National Grid plc Company Z Score Analysis
National Grid's Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
Current National Grid Z Score | | | | 0.6 |
Most of National Grid's fundamental indicators, such as Z Score, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, National Grid plc is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
| First Factor | = | 1.2 * ( | Working Capital | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Second Factor | = | 1.4 * ( | Retained Earnings | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Thrid Factor | = | 3.3 * ( | EBITAD | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Fouth Factor | = | 0.6 * ( | Market Value of Equity | / | Total Liabilities ) |
|
| Fifth Factor | = | 0.99 * ( | Revenue | / | Total Assets ) |
|
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Based on the company's disclosures, National Grid plc has a Z Score of 0.6. This is 82.2% lower than that of the Utilities sector and 16.67% lower than that of the
Utilities - Diversified industry. The z score for all Germany stocks is 93.12% higher than that of the company.
National Z Score Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses National Grid's direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of National Grid could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing National Grid by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
National Grid is regarded
fifth in z score category among its peers.
National Fundamentals
About National Grid Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze National Grid plc's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of National Grid using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of National Grid plc based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our
fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in National Stock
When determining whether National Grid plc is a strong investment it is important to analyze National Grid's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact National Grid's
future performance.
For an informed investment choice regarding National Stock, refer to the following important reports: Check out
Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in National Grid plc. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as
signals in unemployment.
You can also try the
Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.
Please note, there is a significant difference between National Grid's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if National Grid is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, National Grid's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.